Binda Prasad And Anr. vs Raj Ballabh Sahai
Judges:
11 November, 1925·4. Lastly, it has been urged that the question whether the sons are or are not liable is res judicata by virtue of the previous order dated the 2nd of September 1919. At that time the decrees-holder had sought to attach items of property which were different from the property now sought to be attach...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gopal Das vs Baij Nath And Ors.
Judges:
10 November, 1925·3. The facts of this case are that a suit was instituted by the plaintiffs against a firm named Gobind Prasad Makund Ram which has two partners, Gopal Das and Sheo Prasad, father and son. In the plaint the plaintiffs expressly asked that notices should be served on the two partners named individuall...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Rup Agrahri And Ors. vs Naik Ram
Judges:
09 November, 1925·2. The claim was decreed by the first Court on 17th of December 1924, and the defendants applied for the copies of the decree and judgment on the 23rd of December. These copies were ready on the 5th January. An, appeal was preferred by the defendants on the 17th of January 1925, through a vakil whos...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Qazi Fariduddin vs Emperor And Ors.
Judges:
09 November, 1925·1. This is an application in revision from an order directing the complainant to pay compensation of Rs. 100 each to three accused and Rs. 20 to the fourth accused. 2. The applicant filed a complaint under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code in the Court of a first Class Magistrate. The Magistrate ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Faujdar Mahto And Anr. vs King-Emperor
Judges:
06 November, 1925·1. The first point argued in this appeal is that there is a mis-joinder of charges and the whole trial is vitiated by illegality. 2. It appears to me that this argument is well-founded and must be given effect to although the point was not taken specifically in the memorandum of appeal. 3. Briefly, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Banwari Lal vs Jhunka
Judges:
06 November, 1925·3. I have, therefore, to consider whether a revision from an order passed under Section 476-B by the superior Court relates to a proceeding within the meaning of Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 4. Under the old Code a Full Bench of this Court in the matter of the petition of Bhup Kunw...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Beni Ram vs Emperor Through Hira Lal
Judges: Sulaiman
06 November, 1925·1. This is an application in revision from a conviction of the accused under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and a sentence of fine. The facts are not now much disputed. The complainant has a nephew whose daughter is of marriageable age. The accused wanted his son to get married to this girl bu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Faujdar Mahto And Anr. vs Emperor
Judges: Mukerji
06 November, 1925·1. The first point argued in this appeal is that there is a misjoinder of charges and the whole trial is vitiated by illegality. 2. It appears to me that this argument is well-founded and must be given effect to, although the point was not taken specifically in the memorandum of appeal. 3. Briefly, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Banwari Lal vs Jhunka
Judges: Sulaiman
06 November, 1925·3. I have, therefore, to consider whether a revision from an order passed under Section 476-B by the superior Court lelates to a proceeding within the meaning of Section 439 of the Cr. P.C. 4. Under the old Code a Full Bench of this Court In the matter of the petition of Bhup Kunwar 26 A. 249 : A.W....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Beni Ram vs King-Emperor
Judges:
06 November, 1925·1. This is an application in revision from a conviction of the accused under Section 500 of the Penal Code and a sentence of fine. The facts are not now much disputed. The complainant has a nephew whose daughter is of marriageable age. The accused wanted his son to get married to this girl but the c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.