Muhammad Rahim vs Emperor
Judges:
07 July, 1925·JUDGMENT Banerji, J. 1. This is an application in revision by one Muhammad Rahim, who was convicted under Section 323, I.P.C. and fined Rs. 50. He was ordered to execute a personal bond of Rs. 100 with two sureties of Rs. 50 each under Section 106, Criminal P.C. He has come up in revision and variou...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Firm Mangal Chand-Paramsukh Das vs Mt. Zainab Bibi And Anr.
Judges:
07 July, 1925·1. This is a defendant's appeal arising out of a suit for damages. The plaintiff's case was that the defendant in execution of a, decree against her husband Abdul Rashid and others attached a hand-loom belonging to her on 24th of May 1924 and thereby deprived her of its use till 1st of September 192...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nathu Lal vs Raghubir Singh And Ors.
Judges:
07 July, 1925·(2) that, in view of the Privy Council no decision that fraud comes within the words "other sufficient reason" will help the applicant for review unless it is clear that decision recognized the limitation (now definitely declared by the Privy Council) that the reason must be analogous to the two ear...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganga Sahai And Ors. vs Mukarram Ali Khan
Judges:
07 July, 1925·Boys, J. 10. In this case Mukarram All Khan, respondent to the present appeal was on his own petition adjudicated an insolvency under Section 27 of the Provincial Insolvency Act (V of 1920), on 11th January 1917. 11. On the 16th February he was examined, and in the course of his statement he alleged...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jairaj Singh vs Bansi
Judges:
07 July, 1925·1. On 15th March 1925, one Jairaj Singh made a report at the police-station Bachraun, district Moradabad, that Bansi and three others had stolen 8 bundles of sugarcane seeds belonging to him. The report ends up by saying "Mere dawa in charon par hai; tahqiqat chahta hun." After an inquiry by the pol...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Musammat Kishan Dei vs Sheo Paltan
Judges: Sulaiman, Daniels
06 July, 1925·7. This passage is a commentary on the text of Yajnavalkya which is as follows: "The property of a childless woman married in one of the four forms denominated brahma, etc., goes to her husband; but if she leave progeny, it will go to her (daughter's) daughters: and in other forms of marriage (as th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Kishan Dei vs Sheo Paltan
Judges:
06 July, 1925·7. This passage is a commentary on the text of Yajnavalkya which is as follows: The property of a childless woman married in one of the four forms denominated Brahma, etc., goes to her husband; but if she leave progeny, it will go to her (daughter's) daughters; and in other forms of marriage (as the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Fateh Singh And Ors. vs Gopal Narain Singh And Ors.
Judges:
06 July, 1925·6. The Subordinate Judge in whose Court the suit was instituted issued an injunction to the revenue Courts to prevent their going on with the ejectment suit. It seems at least doubtful whether he was competent to do so, but this is a point we need not consider. On 16th April, 1924, he dismissed the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Begam Sultan vs Sarvi Begam
Judges:
01 July, 1925·2. The objection is based on the following circumstances: A decree for sale was obtained against two sets of properties situated in Bulandshahr and Meerut in the year 1907. Before the final decree was passed part of the property situated in the Meerut district was sold at an auction and purchased by...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.