Ahmad Husain And Ors. vs Muhammad Qasim Khan And Ors.
Judges: G Mears, Mukerji
15 July, 1925·3. In Clause (g), para 2 of the plaint, the plaintiffs stated that the original share mortgaged was a 5 biswa one, that a portion of it, viz., 1 biswa, had already been redeemed, that 2 biswas had been purchased by the mortgagees themselves, that 2 biswas remained under mortgage, that out of these 2...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ghurahu Das vs Shakalraj Das
Judges:
15 July, 1925·JUDGMENT Daniels, J. 1. This is a reference by the learned Sessions Judge of Gorakhpur, asking this Court to set aside an order passed under Section 133, Criminal P.C., in regard to an alleged obstruction on a public road. The learned Sessions Judge has given good reasons for setting aside the order...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ahamad Husain And Ors. vs Muhammad Qasin Khan And Ors.
Judges:
15 July, 1925·1. This appeal is against the judgment of a learned Judge of this Court and raises two points. It appears that the learned Judge decided a question of fact, viz., whether all the representatives of the original mortgagees together, had acquired an interest in a part of the mortgaged property or whet...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Narain Das vs Ram Chander And Anr.
Judges:
15 July, 1925·3. It appears that Ram Chander, defendant 2, the brother of the plaintiff, purchased this shop on 13th September 1914 in the course of a sale made by a Receiver under the directions of the Court. The suit in which this Receiver was appointed was Suit No. 485 of 1911. We have at p. 11 of our record t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dip Prakash And Ors. vs Dwarka Prasad And Anr.
Judges:
15 July, 1925·2. After this the judgment debtors filed a set of objections complaining that the decree-holders had fraudulently and without any right got the pavement removed causing a loss of Rs. 5,100 to them. They therefore prayed that the decree-holders might be ordered to get the pavement which they had got ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bisheshar Prasad Pandey vs Raghubir And Anr.
Judges:
14 July, 1925·3. The respondents raise a preliminary objection that no revision lies. They claim that however wrong the order of the Subordinate Judge may have been, his decision has been superseded by the appellate decree of the District Judge. The District Judge had jurisdiction to decide the appeal, and did de...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagat Narain Lal And Anr. vs Hawaldar And Ors.
Judges:
10 July, 1925·1. We have heard the learned Counsel in this appeal. We think it must fail. The dispute between the parties was as to the amount of consideration, the vendee pleading that it was Rs. 3,495 and the plaintiff asserting that the price was only Rs. 1,500. The Court of first instance found in favour of t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Harihar Dat vs Maksud Ali And Ors.
Judges:
10 July, 1925·1. The point which arises in this reference is as to whether when a complaint has been filed against an accused per9on for offences some of which are triable exclusively by the Magistrate and some by the Sessions Court and the accused after trial is discharged in respect of all the offences, an orde...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Muhammad Yusuf Khan vs Mahadeo Prasad
Judges:
10 July, 1925·1. This is a judgment-debtor's appeal arising out of an execution matter. A preliminary decree for sale was passed on 30th May 1916 and an appeal was preferred from that decree to the Court of the District Judge who modified the decree finally on 27th November 1919. Between the passing of the decree...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sultan Muhammad Khan And Ors. vs Emperor
Judges:
10 July, 1925·1. This is a revision from an order of the Additional Sessions Judge directing a re-trial. The application is made on behalf of Mahbub Hasan Khan and eight other accused persons. A complaint under Section 147 read with Section 395, I.P.O., was made by Abdul Aziz Khan against these accused in the Cou...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.