Ganga Dhar Baij Nath vs Bombay, Baroda And Central India ...
Judges:
03 December, 1925·JUDGMENT Daniels, J. 1. This is a revision under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act. The question raised is whether there was a sufficient compliance with Section 17 of that Act in presenting an application to set aside an ex parte decree. The application was presented on the last d...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Peary Lal vs Allahabad Bank Ltd.
Judges:
03 December, 1925·3. Pearey Lal raised two objections: First, he said the question of title as between the Bank and Pearey Lal should be settled by the Insolvency Court; and secondly he said that he was a bona fide transferee for value and the decree was not attachable as the property of Baij Nath and Murli Dhar. The...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Muhammad Afzal vs Muhammad Mahmud And Ors.
Judges:
03 December, 1925·1. This is an appeal from a judgment of the Subordinate Judge, holding that a certain deed, dated the 27th of March 1880, purporting to be a deed of waqf did not create a valid waqf. It is sufficient to say that this actual deed has already been on other occasions during the last seven years held to...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Firm Chandrabhan Prakashnath vs East Indian Railway Company
Judges: Mukerji
02 December, 1925·2. It appears that a consignment of glass bangles consisting of six bundles was sent to the address of the plaintiff from Wadi Bunder in Bombay for delivery at Ferozabad. Out of the six bundles only four were delivered. It was with respect to the two bundles not delivered that the suit was brought f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gokul Das And Ors. vs Nathu
Judges: Mukerji
02 December, 1925·1. These two applications in revision may be disposed of by the same judgment as the facts are very similar. 2. The applicants who are plaintiffs in two different suits are money-lenders by profession and their practice of money-lending is something like this They send munims or trusted servants of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandrabhan Prakashnath vs E.I. Ry. Co.
Judges:
02 December, 1925·2. It appears that a consignment of glass bangles consisting of six bundles was sent to the address of the plaintiff from Wadi Bunder in Bombay for delivery at Ferozabad. Out of the six bundles only four were delivered. It was with respect to the two bundles not delivered that the suit was brought f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gokul Das And Ors. vs Nathu
Judges:
02 December, 1925·1. These two applications in revision may be disposed of by the same judgment as the facts are very similar. 2. The applicants who are plaintiffs in two different suits are money-lenders by profession and their practice of money-lending is something like this. They send munims or trusted servants of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lalman And Anr. vs Chaudhri Shiam Singh
Judges: Dalal, Boys
01 December, 1925·1. A preliminary decree for sale of property was passed by the first Court of the Subordinate Judge of Mainpuri on the 15th of April 1921. The defendant mortgagor appealed against this decree, to this Court on the 22nd of July 1921. While the appeal was pending the mortgagee applied under Order XXXI...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Musammat Durga Bai vs Unknown
Judges: Walsh, K Lal
01 December, 1925·JUDGMENT 1. This is an application in revision against an order made by the District Judge of Agra on the 30th of Maylast with regard to the disposition of the funds of certain minors by their guardian. The two children are aged respectively 13 and 14. The girl is 13, and the learned Judge, by the o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kalap Nath vs Emperor
Judges: Sulaiman
01 December, 1925·JUDGMENT Sulaiman, J. 1. This is a Reference by the Sessions Judge of Benares recommending that the conviction and the sentence passed on the accused under Section 34(4) of Act V of 1861 should be set aside. The accused is apparently a servant of some lady who deputed him to supply water to all who ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.