Mulai Rai vs Emperor
Judges:
07 December, 1925·1. This is a criminal revision from an order convicting the accused tinder Section 190 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 55. 2. The applicant is the mukhtar-am of Mt. Daulata Kunwar who had constructed a temple inside her house, installed idols therein and performed puja b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Majid vs Wahidullah
Judges:
03 December, 1925·JUDGMENT Daniels, J. 1. The plaintiff filed a suit against the defendant which was dismissed under Order 9, Rule 8, as on the date of hearing the defendant was present but the plaintiff was absent. An application was made under Order 9, Rule 9, to restore the case but was rejected. Against that orde...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Muhammad Ismail vs Vahiduddin
Judges:
03 December, 1925·1. This revision arises out of a suit for recovery of money brought on a promissory-note, dated the 10th of August 1923, admittedly executed by the respondent in favour of the plaintiff-applicant. 2. The Court below has found in effect that the plaintiff was prosecuting one Khatratullah for cheating...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheikh Muhammad Ismail vs Vahiduddin
Judges: Mukerji
03 December, 1925·1. This revision arises out of a suit for recovery of money brought on a promissory-note dated the 10th of August 1923 admittedly executed by the respondent in favour of the plaintiff-applicant. 2. The Court below has found in effect that the plaintiff was prosecuting one Khairat-ullah for cheating,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ghissu vs Amir Ali Khan
Judges:
03 December, 1925·1. This revision is pressed on the ground that the Court below has entirely misread the findings submitted to is on a remand under Order 41, Rule 25. An examination of the record shows this to be correct. The issues remitted were: (1) Are the plots in suit situated in Mahal Basin Begam? (2) Did the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ghissu vs Amir Ali Khan
Judges: Daniels
03 December, 1925·1. This revision is pressed on the ground that the Court below has entirely misread the findings submitted to it on a remand under Order XLI, Rule 25. An examination of the record shows this to be correct. The issues remitted were: (1) Are the plots in suit situated in Mahal Basti Begam? (2) Did the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Maulvi Muhammad Afzal vs Maulvi Muhammad Mahmud And Ors.
Judges: Walsh, K Lal
03 December, 1925·1. This is an appeal from a judgment of the Subordinate Judge holding that a certain deed, dated the i7th of March 1880, purporting to be a deed of waqf, did not create a valid waqf. It is sufficient to say that this actual deed has already been on other occasions during the last seven years held to...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Majid vs Wahidullah
Judges: Daniels
03 December, 1925·JUDGMENT Daniels, J. 1. The plaintiff filed a suit against the defendant which was dismissed under Order IX, Rule 8, as on the date of,, hearing the defendant was present but the plaintiff was absent. An application was made under Order IX, Rule 9 to restore the case but was rejected. Against that o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganga Dhar-Baij Nath vs Bombay-Baroda And Central India ...
Judges: Daniels
03 December, 1925·JUDGMENT Daniels, J. 1. This is a revision under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act. The question raised is whether there was a sufficient compliance with Section 17 of that Act in presenting an application to set aside an ex parte decree. The application was presented on the last d...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pearey Lal vs The Allahabad Bank Ltd. And Babu ...
Judges: Mukerji
03 December, 1925·3. Pearey Lal raised two objections. First; he said the question of title, as between the Bank and Pearey Lal should be settled by the Insolvency Court and secondly he said that he was a bona fide transferee for value and the decree was not attachable as the property of Baij Nath and Murli Dhar. The...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.