Chunni And Ors. vs Baldeo Singh
Judges:
08 April, 1925·5. The decision of the appeal involves discussion of several points. While it is recognized by what is rather loosely called 'the common law of this province' that trees of spontaneous growth standing on fields in the cultivation of tenants are in the absence of special custom or contract the proper...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nehal Singh vs Jagannath Das
Judges:
07 April, 1925·The auction sale was held through an amin and this was in contravention of Section 193, Clause (1) of the Tenancy Act and the sale did not pass any title to the plaintiff ; (2) the suit is barred by time; (3) the share purchased by the plaintiff is less than what is claimed; and (4)at the time of sa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
(Munshi) Shib Ram vs Faqira And Anr.
Judges:
06 April, 1925·4. The learned Subordinate Judge framed four issues and the first one of these was whether the plaintiffs or Mt. Durgi owned the house. The second issue was whether the defendant rented the house from the plaintiffs or Mt. Durgi. If so, at what rate of rent? 5. The learned Subordinate Judge did not ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: A Vakil vs Unknown
Judges:
06 April, 1925·1. There is no doubt that you and the counsel who have represented the respondent have acted wisely in the course which has been followed. We wish this case to be clearly understood and not to be twisted into something quite different from the reality. It is not a case in which we have asked the res...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: B. Raj Bahadur Jain vs Unknown
Judges: G Mears, Lindsay, Mukerji
06 April, 1925·1. There is no doubt that you and the Counsel who have represented the respondent have acted wisely in the course which has been followed. We wish this case to be clearly understood and not to be twisted into something quite different from the reality. It is not a case in which we have asked the res...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bijai vs Narain
Judges:
06 April, 1925·JUDGMENT Piggott, J. 1. These two connected appeals arise out of two suits which were tried together. There was a dispute between Bijai and his brother Narain about a certain occupancy holding. Bijai claimed to be a joint tenant along with Narain. Bach of them brought a suit in the civil Court to en...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Baldeo Ram And Anr. vs Kunkun Ram
Judges:
03 April, 1925·1. This is an appeal by two plaintiffs whose suit for possession of a certain house and recovery of rent has been dismissed by two Courts. The first question raised is whether the judgment of the lower appellate Court can be accepted as one which complies adequately with the requirements of the law ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Azmatulla Khan vs Ahmad Ali
Judges:
01 April, 1925·JUDGMENT Stuart, J. 1. The main point for decision in these two revisions is whether there has been substantial compliance with the provisions of Section 17 of Act IX of 1887. A decree had been passed by the Small Cause Court ex parte against Ahmad Ali for Rs. 483-9 and Rs. 56-11 costs. This decree ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Azmatullah Khan vs Ahmad Ali
Judges: Stuart
01 April, 1925·JUDGMENT Stuart, J. 1. The main point for decision in these two revisions is whether there has been substantial compliance with the provisions of Section 17 of Act IX of 1887. A decree had been passed by the Small Cause Court ex parte against Ahmed Ali for Rs. 483-9 and Rs. 56-11 costs. This decree ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lala Sri Niwas vs The East Indian Railway Company ...
Judges: Stuart
01 April, 1925·1. The decision of the Full Bench in Chuni Lal v. Nizam's Guaranteed State Railway Co. Limited 29 A. 228 : A.W.N. (1907) 21 : 4 A.L.J. 80 : 2 M.L.T. 42 (F.B.) is authority for the proposition that there was one contract with the East Indian Railway Company who were liable for the overcharge (if any)...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.