Pandit Shyam Lal vs Badri And Anr.
Judges:
22 June, 1923·JUDGMENT Kanhaiya Lal, J. 1. This appeal arises out a suit for the redemption of a mortgage effected by the plaintiffs, Badri and Kidar, in favour of the defendant on the 23rd of December 1915. The mortgage was effected for a sum of Rs. 135, which was re-payable with interest at 2 per cent, per mens...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Santi Lal And Anr. vs Raj Narain And Anr.
Judges: G Mears, Piggott
21 June, 1923·JUDGMENT 1. This is an application for leave to appeal to His Majesty in Council against an order of this Court, dated the 4th of December 1922. There are materials on the record quite sufficient to show that the value of the subject-matter in dispute between the parties in the proceedings resulting...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Santi Lal And Anr. vs Raj Narain And Anr.
Judges: G Mears, Piggott
21 June, 1923·JUDGMENT Grimwood Mears, C.J. and Piggott, J. 1. This is an application' for leave to appeal to His Majesty in Council against an order of this Court, dated the 4th of December, 1922. There are materials on the record quite sufficient to show that the value of the subject-matter in dispute between t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mata Ghulam vs Sheo Mangal And Ors.
Judges: K Lal
21 June, 1923·JUDGMENT Kanhaiya Lal, J. 1. The question for consideration in this suit was whether the plaintiff was the proprietor of the plots in dispute. The defendants claimed to hold the same as occupancy tenants and alleged that the plaintiff was in cultivatory possession thereof as a sub-tenant on their be...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kanhaiya Lal vs Kapur Chand
Judges: G Mears, Piggott
21 June, 1923·2. It appears from the very scanty record that lies before us that the learned Subordinate Judge apparently grouped the two applications of the 8th and 12th of September together. We have studied with great care, and with the assistance of Mr. Dube and Mr. Lalit Mohan Banerji, the order that he pass...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Uman Shankar And Anr. vs Musammat Aisha Khatun
Judges: Lindsay, Sulaiman
20 June, 1923·4. In appeal it is contended that it is proved that Sarjiwan Lal was a separated Hindu and, further, that even assuming that he was joint with his brothers, Musammat Dulari's possession, in consequence of her own admissions, was never adverse and that at best she only acquired a Hindu widow's estate...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheikh Nimat-Ullah vs Musammat Salut-Un-Nissa Bibi
Judges: K Lal
20 June, 1923·JUDGMENT Kanhaiya Lal, J. 1. The question for consideration in this case is, whether the plaintiff is entitled to an order directing the defendant to remove the trees standing on old plot No. 97-13 corresponding with No. 123 new khasra of Mouza Simra Tappa. The parties were co-sharers of the village...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Firm Dwarka Das-Ajodhiya Prasad vs Firm Lachimi Narain-Girdhari Lal
Judges: Daniels
19 June, 1923·JUDGMENT Daniels, J. 1. This is an application for revision of a decree, of the Judge of the Small Cause Court, Cawnpore SQ far, as it awards a sum, of Rs. 59 against the applicant firm Dworka Das Ajodhia Prasad on the basis of a hundi. The hundi was drawn on the applicants and the whole question so...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rabi Pratab Narain Singh vs Mahanth Ram Prasad Bharthi
Judges: Daniels
19 June, 1923·JUDGMENT Daniels, J. 1. This application raises a question of jurisdiction. The plaintiff is a grove holder and the defendant the zemindar. The suit was brought on the allegation that the defendant being entitled to one fourth of the fruits of the grove had wrongfully appropriated one half of the fr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahant Ram Prasad Bharthi vs Rabi Pratap Narain Singh
Judges: Daniels
19 June, 1923·JUDGMENT Daniels, J. 1. This application raises a question of jurisdiction. The plaintiff is a grove-holder and the defendant the zamindar. The suit was brought on the allegation that the defendant being entitled to one-fourth of the fruits of the grove had wrongfully appropriated one-half of the fr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.