Parsotam Dass vs Shiam Lal
Judges: Walsh, Ryves
29 January, 1923·2. The original parties to the dispute, being related, went to arbitration and the Arbitrator passed an award which left certain matters outstanding for subsequent division, such as had to be provided for by machinery created for the purpose, but not such as involved the determination of any substan...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cawnpore Cotton Mills Co. Ld. vs Great Indian Peninsula Railway
Judges: Lindsay, Daniels
29 January, 1923·3. We have been referred to a number of cases which have been decided by the various High Courts, and Dr. Katju, who has argued the case very ably on behalf of the appellant, has laid particular stress upon a ruling of the Madras High Court in the case of A. Mahadeva Ayyar v. South Indian Railway Co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Fateh Singh vs Thakur Rukmini Ramanji Maharaj
Judges: G Mears, P C Banerji, Piggott, Walsh, Ryves
26 January, 1923·2. The case was argued before a Bench of two Judges, by whom it was referred to a Full Bench in order that the questions of law raised might be finally determined. 3. The question regarding the effect of the decision in favour of Duli Chand in suit No. 163 of 1907 need no detain us long, indeed it w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Fateh Singh And Ors. vs Thakur Rukmini Rawanji Maharaj
Judges: G Mears, P Banerji, Piggott, Walsh, Ryves
26 January, 1923·2. The case was argued before a Bench of two Judges by whom it was referred to a Full Bench in order that the questions of law raised might be finally determined. 3. The question regarding the effect of the decision in favour of Duli Chand in Suit No. 163 of 1907 need not detain us long, Indeed, it ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jeot Ram vs Gopi Ram And Anr. And Sheo Nath ...
Judges: Rafiq, Piggott
26 January, 1923·If the vendee, his heirs or representatives, desired to sell the house purchased, they should, in such a case, first ask the executant, his heirs or representatives for the time being, to purchase it. But if the executant, or his heirs or representatives, refused to purchase, the vendee, his heirs o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shib Lal vs Bidha Singh And Rup Singh And Ors.
Judges: Rafique, Piggott
26 January, 1923·JUDGMENT 1. On the 24th July 1919 one Rup Singh executed a sale-deed of his share in favour of Shib Lal in lieu of Rs. 2,000. The same day Shib Lal hypothecated the said share to third parties in lieu of Rs. 1,600. On the 30th March, 1920 the plaintiffs-respondents brought the suit out of which this...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lalta Prasad vs Kharga And Anr.
Judges: Lindsay
25 January, 1923·3. By way of defence to the suit, the defendants pleaded (1) that the land was not capable of resumption inasmuch as it was abadi land and not agricultural land and (2) that by reason of certain facts they had become the proprietors of the land in question. The defendants pleaded that they had held ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
S.T. Gadre vs Brijnandan Saran
Judges: Lindsay
25 January, 1923·4. Under an order of the learned District Judge the case was transferred for disposal to the Court of the Second Subordinate Judge of Cawnpore and it was decided ex-parte on the 28th of June 1922. 5. The Second Subordinate Judge of Cawnpore on his date was Babu Aghore Nath Mukerji. 6. On the 28th of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Faiz Muhammad And Ors. vs Inayat Husain And Ors.
Judges: Walsh, Ryves
25 January, 1923·1. In this case I can see no satisfactory answer to the view expressed in the judgment of the first court. Left to my own view, I should hold unhesitatingly that this was a suit by the plaintiffs to recover possession of an imambara by virtue of having been appointed as trustees in the place of the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lalta Prasad vs Kharga And Anr.
Judges: Lindsay
25 January, 1923·3. By way of defence to the suit the defendants pleaded (1) that the land was not capable of resumption, inasmuch as it was abadi land and not agricultural land, and (2) that by reason of certain facts they had become the proprietors o the land in question. The defendants pleaded that they had held ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.