Bohra Shiam Sundar Lal And Anr. vs Sri Thakur Radhika Raman Bihariji ...
Judges: Lindsay, Sulaiman
20 April, 1923·1. These are appeals by, a defendant arising out of two suits for pre-emption. 2. On the 11th of June, 1919, defendant No. 2 executed a sale-deed in favour of Jamuna Prasad, defendant No. 1, of a certain share in Mahaban. This was followed by another sale-deed, dated the 11th of May, 1920, of anothe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Thakur Radhika Raman Bihariji ... vs Bohra Shiam Sundar Lal And Anr.
Judges: Lindsay, Sulaiman
20 April, 1923·1. These are appeals by a defendant arising out of two suits for pre-emption. 2. On the nth of June 1919 defendant No.2 Executed a sale-deed in favour of Jamuna Prasad, defendant No.1, of a certain share in Mahaban. This was followed by another sale-deed, dated the nth of May 1920, of another share ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Das Rai And Ors. vs Sheikh Abdul Gafoor And Ors.
Judges: Lindsay, Sulaiman
20 April, 1923·1. This is a defendants' appeal arising out of a suit for pre-emption. The Court of first instance dismissed the suit. On appeal the learned District Judge has decreed it. The plaintiffs, in order to prove the custom alleged, relied on an entry in the wajib-ul-arz of 1883 which prima facie raised a ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Alama Chand vs Chhajju
Judges: Lindsay, Sulaiman
20 April, 1923·2. It is contended before us that because the wajib-ul-arz it question is so framed as to refer to matters other than pre-emption it ought not to foe treated as a record of custom but merely as a record of contract. 3. It has no doubt been held in a number of cases which have been consistently follo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nannhu And Ors. vs Roshan Singh
Judges: Daniels
20 April, 1923·1. This is an application for revision of an order of the learned Munsif of Shikohabad granting permission to withdraw a suit under Order XXIII, Rule 1, with permission to file a fresh suit. The application for withdrawal was made after a considerable amount of evidence had been recorded on both sid...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Devi Prasad vs The Secretary Of State For India In ...
Judges: Daniels
19 April, 1923·JUDGMENT Daniels, J. 1. This is a revision from an order of the learned Judge of the Small Cause Court, Allahabad. The point for decision before him was whether a deposit in a provident fund, which so long as the subscriber was in service was a compulsory deposit within the meaning of Section 2(4) o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Musammat Ballo vs Ram Kishan And Anr.
Judges: Lindsay, Sulaiman
19 April, 1923·Both the Courts below have found that the adoption did in fact take place and have also accepted the defendant's evidence as establishing the existence of the alleged custom. The plaintiff comes here in second appeal and urges that the evidence adduced to prove the custom permitting such adoption is...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Devi Prasad vs Secretary Of State For India In ...
Judges: Daniels
19 April, 1923·JUDGMENT Daniels, J. 1. This is a revision from an order of the learned Judge of the Small Cause Court, Allahabad. The point for decision before him was whether a deposit it a Provident Fund; which so long as the subscriber was in service was a compulsory deposit within the meaning of Section 2(4) o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kundan Lal And Anr. vs Basant Rai
Judges: K Lal
19 April, 1923·1. Basant Rai is the sola respondent in this appeal. The question for consideration in this appeal is whether a lambardar can sue the other co-sharers of the village, who hold sir or khudkasht land, for a refund of such profits as they may have realized in excess of their share. 2. The suit was file...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Parsotam vs Ganpat Ram
Judges: G Prasad
17 April, 1923·JUDGMENT Gokul Prasad, J. 1. This is a plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit for possession of a portion of a fixed rate tenancy and removal of a house built upon it by the defendant. The defendant pleaded in reply that the construction was not on plaintiff's land, that the plaintiff had not been...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.