Lachman Prasad vs The Secretary Of State For India In ...
Judges: Tudball, Sulaiman
12 May, 1921·1. This is a plaintiff's appeal arising out of a proceeding under the Land Acquisition Act. A preliminary objection is taken on behalf of the Secretary of State that, inasmuch as the owner's claim was not filed before the date fixed in the notice, the Judge should not have allowed larger compensatio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Sahai And Ors. vs Parbhu Dayal
Judges: Lindsay, K Lal
12 May, 1921·3. The main point, urged on behalf of the defendants appellants, is that in view of the fact that Rs. 950 had actually been paid to Ajudhia Prasad, the father of the plaintiff respondent, the sale ought not to have been set aside without protecting the rights of the defendants-vendees in regard to t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Parbhu Dayal vs Ram Sahai And Ors.
Judges: Lindsay, K Lal
12 May, 1921·3. The main point urged on behalf of the defendants appellants is that in view of the fact that Rs. 950 had actually been paid to Ajudhia Prasad, the father of the plaintiff respondent, the sale ought not to have been set aside without protecting the rights of the defendants vendees in regard to tha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Narindra Bahadur Singh vs The Oudh Commercial Bank Limited
Judges: V Haldane, Atkinson, J Edge
09 May, 1921·2. The appellant is now resisting the execution of the decree, because, he says, the decree absolute is not binding on him, inasmuch as the Court of Wards had no jurisdiction to represent him in the proceedings. 3. The contention of the respondents and the view taken by the Court below is that the a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Musammat Ram Debi vs Gobind Sahai And Ors.
Judges: Stuart
07 May, 1921·JUDGMENT Stuart, J. 1. I do not agree with the view of the learned District Magistrate. The words in Section 250 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, "the Magistrate by whom the case is heard," mean "the Magistrate by whom the case is decided." I do not take the words to mean that, when the Magistrate...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Madhusudan Das vs Birj Lal
Judges: Stuart
07 May, 1921·JUDGMENT Stuart, J. 1. Musammat Inda Kunwar wag plaintiff in a suit against Brij Lal. The Trial Court decreed her suit in part. The High Court in appeal decreed the whole. The Privy Council upheld the decision of the High Court; with a modification in one particular. Under the decree of the High Cou...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raghunandan Rai vs Raghunandan Pande And Ors.
Judges: P Banerji, Tudball, Stuart
06 May, 1921·3. The suit was resisted on various grounds. It was denied that any trees existing on the land which belonged to the mortgagor had been out down but it was asserted that the trees out down were the trees of a grove planted by the mortgagee after the mortgage. It was also alleged that there was a sub...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raghunandan Rai vs Raghunandan Pande And Ors.
Judges: P C Banerji, Tudball, Stuart
06 May, 1921·3. The suit was resisted on various grounds. It was denied that any trees existing on the land which belonged to the, mortgagor had been cut down, but it was asserted that the trees cut down were the trees of a grove planted by the mortgagee after the mortgage. It was also alleged that there was a s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Fazal Ilahi vs East Indian Railway Company
Judges: Stuart, K Lal
05 May, 1921·2. He booked the consignment at the parcels office and paid Rs. 38 in advance at parcels rates. The weight was two maunds and 29 seers. The consignment was booked on the 80th of May 1917. A receipt was given to Fazal Ilahi, No. 3,808, dated the 30th May, 1917, Exhibit 2. Faisal Ilahi's intention was...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Fazal Ilahi vs East Indian Railway Company
Judges: Stuart, K Lal
05 May, 1921·4. The first point I propose to decide is with regard to the value of the goods. The materials on the record are sufficient for the determination of this point, which was not decided by the courts below, and I decide it under Section 103 of the Code of Civil procedure. I see no reason to disbelieve ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.