Darbari Lal vs Gobind Ram And Ors.
Judges: Rafique, Stuart
31 March, 1921·JUDGMENT 1. In this case the plaintiff-appellant, who was entitled to succeed to the estate of one Hoti Lal on the death of the widow of Hoti Lal, Musammat Mul Kunwar, sued for recovery of possession of a house sold by Hoti Lals widow, Musammat Mul Kunwar, to the ancestors of the defendants on the 2...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Firm Sitaram Nathmal vs Firm Sushil Chandra Das
Judges: Walsh, Ryves
31 March, 1921·1. This is an appeal from an order of the District Judge of Cawnpore directing an award to be filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act of 1899, In our opinion the appeal fails. Several objections were raised to the filing of the award at the hearing before the learned Judge. Some of them necess...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Darbari Lal vs Gobind Ram And Ors.
Judges: M Rafiq, Stuart
31 March, 1921·JUDGMENT Muhammad Rafiq and Stuart, JJ. 1. In this case the plaintiff appellant, who was entitled to succeed to the estate of one Hoti Lal on the death of the widow of Hoti Lal, Musammat Mul Kunwar, sued for recovery of possession of a house sold by Hoti Lal's widow, Musammat Mul Kunwar, to the ance...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Harbans Nath Tewari And Ors. vs Achraj Nath And Ors.
Judges: Walsh, Ryves
30 March, 1921·1. This is an appeal raising a question which also governs Appeals Nos. 113 and 114, Nice questions are raised by the appeal, but we do not think it necessary to express any opinion about them, it is one of those cases where possibly not entirely owing to the feelings of the parties themselves, the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Firm Sita-Ram-Nathmal vs Sushil Chandra Das And Co.
Judges: Walsh, Ryves
30 March, 1921·JUDGMENT 1. The question raised in this appeal is something more than coademis, because the learned Judge, although granting a stay, has dearly indicated by his judgment that he retains seisin and control over the suit, and it is impossible not to read his order of stay as being no more than a tempo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sushil Chandra Das And Co. vs Sita Ram Nath Mal
Judges: Walsh, Ryves
30 March, 1921·JUDGMENT Walsh and Ryves, JJ. 1. The question raised in this appeal is something more than academic, because the learned Judge, although granting a stay, has clearly indicated by his judgment that he retains seisin and control over the suit, and it is impossible not to read his order of stay as bein...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiam Sarup And Anr. vs Nand Ram
Judges: Rafique, Stuart
30 March, 1921·1. This appeal arises out of a suit brought on foot of a mortgage, dated the 25th October 1912, for the recovery of the mortgage-money. It appears that Chheda Lal and Kanhaiya Lal had executed a prior mortgage on the 10th of March 1908 in favour of Bhagwan Das. That mortgage remained unpaid until th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nand Ram vs Shiam Sarup And Anr.
Judges: M Rafiq, Stuart
30 March, 1921·1. This appeal arises out of a suit brought on foot of a mortgage, dated the 25th of October, 1912, for the recovery of the mortgage money. It appears that Chheda Lal and Kanhaiya Lal executed a prior mortgage on the 10th of March, 1908, in favour of Bhagwan Das. That mortgage remained unpaid until ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mathura Prasad vs Jamil-Un-Nissa Bibi
Judges: Walsh, Ryves
29 March, 1921·JUDGMENT Walsh and Ryves, JJ. 1. This is an execution appeal arising out of execution proceedings on a mortgage decree passed as long ago as the 30th of August, 1910. The suit was for sale on a mortgage, and a preliminary decree on that date directed that a sum of Rs. 8,712 representing the amount t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Musammat Jamilunnissa Bibi vs B. Mathura Parshad
Judges: Walsh, Ryves
29 March, 1921·JUDGMENT 1. This is an, execution appeal arising out of execution proceedings on a mortgage decree passed as long ago as the 30th of August 1910. The suit was for sale on a mortgage and a preliminary decree on that date directed that a sum of Rs. 8,712, representing the amount then due for principal...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.