Firm Chhajju Mal-Munna Lal vs Firm Pyare Lal-Jumna Prasad
Judges: Walsh, Wallach
29 July, 1921·1. In this case it is absolutely imperative to interfere in the interests of justice. We think that technically there is no appeal because the order was certainly not under Order XLI, Rule 13, indeed it was an order which could not reasonably be made under any provision of any Code, but it did not p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhup Singh vs Jhamman Singh And Ors.
Judges: Tudball, Sulaiman
28 July, 1921·(1) Rs. 4,600 due by the mortgagors to the mortgagees on the basis of a registered dimple mortgage-deed of the 19th of November 1910, which had been executed to secure a sum of Rs. 6,400. (2) Rs. 10 taken by the executants to meet the expenses of the deed. (3) Rs. 400 taken in cash, Rs. 275 of which...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Musammat Hijaban And Ors. vs Ali Sher Khan
Judges: Walsh, Wallach
27 July, 1921·JUDGMENT 1. This judgment in quite right. The question is covered by authority, not merely by authority, but by a large Bench of this Court whose mind was no doubt instrusted and led by a great Mahammadan lawyer. That is the case referred to by the learned Judge of the Court below reported as Abdul ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bankey Lal And Ors. vs Meghraj And Anr.
Judges: Walsh, Wallach
27 July, 1921·JUDGMENT 1. In our opinion no appeal lies from this order, which is an order of the District Judge returning a memorandum of appeal on the revenue side for the purpose of its being presented to the Appellate Court on the revenue side. In other words, the District Judge formed the opinion that it was...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandar Lal Sah And Anr. vs Collector Of Bareilly
Judges: Tudball, Sulaiman
26 July, 1921·3. Section 26 of the Act says: Every award under this part shall be in writing signed by the Judge and shall specify the amount awarded under clause first of Sub-section (1) of Section 23 and also the amounts (if any) respectively awarded under each of the other clauses of the same sub-section toget...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandu Lal Shah And Anr. vs The Collector Of Bareilly
Judges: Tudball, Sulaiman
26 July, 1921·it is ordered that the award of the Collector of Bareilly be confirmed, that a decree be drawn up as laid down in Sections 26 and 27 of the Land Acquisition Act, that the petitioner do pay all costs of these proceedings except those costs regarding which orders have been passed by the Hon'ble High C...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Lal vs Deo Raj
Judges: Walsh, Wallach
26 July, 1921·1. We have no doubt as to what our answers to these questions should be. 2. To question (a) our answer is, to adopt a technical form, "No, it did not re-open it so as to confer jurisdiction to refer the matter to arbitration, but it did not, affect it and the Ajmer Court had original jurisdiction to...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lachmi Narain Alias Lalman vs Nannha Mal And Anr.
Judges: Stuart
26 July, 1921·JUDGMENT Stuart, J. 1. A certain house in the Town of Kaimganj belonged to Sita Ram Seraogi. On his death it descended to his sons Kirpa Ram and Chhote Lal. Kirpa Ram was succeeded by his sons Girdhari and Radha Kishan. Chhote Lal was succeeded by his song Shitab Rai, Biddeh Chand and Thakur Das. Th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Har Pershad vs Ram Chander And Ors.
Judges: P Banerji, Stuart, Wallach
25 July, 1921·2. It has been conceded before us on behalf of, the appellant that so far as the half share of Dhani Ram is concerned, the claim for possession by the plaintiff is not maintainable. Dhani Ram was no party to the subsequent bond of the 28th of June 1881 and, therefore, all that he was liable for was ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Har Prasad vs Ram Chandar And Ors.
Judges: P C Banerji, Stuart, Wallach
25 July, 1921·1. The facts of this case are these: Two brothers, Jhamman and Dhani Ram, made a usufructuary mortgage of two-thirds of certain zamindari property is favour of Har Prasad on the 28th of January, 1880, for a sum of Rs. 332. Under that mortgage the mortgagee obtained possession and got mutation of nam...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.