Saheb Ram vs Musammat Gobind
Judges: Tudball, Lindsay
25 January, 1921·(3) He then pleaded that the plaintiff was not entitled to more than a one-third share in the amount recovered, and, lastly, (4) He pleaded that Musammat Govindi was not the heir as Brij Narain was the adopted son of Har Prasad and in his presence she had no title. 2. Daring the pendency of the suit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Aziz vs Bohra Tara Chand
Judges: G Prasad
25 January, 1921·JUDGMENT Gokul Prasad, J. 1. This is an application in revision from the decision of the District Judge of Agra, dismissing an appeal against an order of sanction to prosecute the applicant for giving false evidence. The only judgment passed by the learned District Judge in appeal is, "The applicati...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Madho Prasad And Anr. vs Pearey Lal And Anr.
Judges: G Prasad
25 January, 1921·JUDGMENT Gokul Prasad, J. 1. The only point raised before me is whether the decree-holders should in execution of their decree proceed against the applicants by an application to the Execution Department, What happened was that the decree-holders put in an application for execution and in execution ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raghubir Singh And Ors. vs Musammat Lakhan
Judges: Tudball, Lindsay
25 January, 1921·1. This is a plaintiff's appeal. The only question of law which is raised is whether a portion of the plaintiff's claim is barred by Section 111 of the (United Provinces) Land Revenue Act. It appears that certain partition proceedings took place in which Raghubir Singh, the plaintiff, was concerned....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lalman Alias Laloo And Ors. vs Gopi Nath And Ors.
Judges: Tudball, Lindsay
25 January, 1921·1. This is a plaintiffs' appeal. The plaintiffs are the owners of a firm which carries on business at Banda. Their claim was against a firm which carried on a business at Calcutta at the time the suit was filed in the Court of first instance. It appears that the Calcutta firm had come into the hands...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Musammat Govindi vs Sahib Ram
Judges: Tudball, Lindsay
25 January, 1921·1. Second Appeals Nos. 649 and 650 of 1918 are between the same parties and arise out of the same suit. On the 18th of November, 1891, one Har Narain executed a mortgage deed for a sum of Ra. 900 in favour of three persons, Sahib Ram and his brother Ajai Ram and, their cousin Har Prasad, On the 30fc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sarju Prasad vs Ram Sarup
Judges: Tudball
24 January, 1921·JUDGMENT Tudball, J. 1. This is an application in revision. The facts are these: Two persons, Ram Sarup and Manni Lal, were partners in a shop, A debt was due to the shop from the present applicant, Sarju Prasad, The two partners brought a suit against him and against another person. The applicant a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mul Chand And Nemi Chand vs Basdeo, Ram Sarup And Ors.
Judges: Tudball
24 January, 1921·JUDGMENT Tudball, J. 1. This is an application in revision under Section 25 of the Small Cause Courts Act. The facts are as follows: The plaintiff, opposite party, brought a suit against the applicants to recover a certain sum of money. In the plaint, as it stood first, that sum was Rs. 285-12-0. He...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sitla Bakhsh Singh vs Sital Singh And Ors.
Judges: Buckmaster, Phillimore, A Ali, L Jenkins
24 January, 1921·First--A list of all persons who are to be considered taluqdars within the meaning of this Act. Second--A list of the taluqdars whose estates, according to the custom of the family of and before the thirteenth day of February, 1856, ordinarily devolved upon a single heir. Third--A list of the taluqd...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Firm Basdeo Ram Sarup Through Ram ... vs Firm Seth Mulchand Nemichand ...
Judges: Tudball
24 January, 1921·JUDGMENT 1. This is an application in revision under Section 25 of the Small Cause Courts Act. The facts are as follows:--The plaintiff-opposite party brought a suit against the applicants to recover a certain sum of money. In the plaint, as it stood first, that sum was Rs. 285-12-0. He also asked f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.