Srimati Pramila Devi vs Chander Shekhar Chatterji And ...
Judges: Piggott, Walsh
31 January, 1921·JUDGMENT 1. The Court below had to decide about the granting of a succession certificate for the collection of certain debts due to a deceased Bengali Brahmio, Babu Karnoamoy Banerji. The rival applicants were a widowed daughter with no children and two sons by another daughter previously deceased. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chaudhry Munna Singh vs Kuar Digbijay Singh And Ors.
Judges: Piggott, Walsh
31 January, 1921·1. The question for determination in the Court below was, whether certain money due from the appellant Munna Singh under the decree of a Bent Court, was or was not a "debt" within the meaning of Section 6(3) of the Provincial Insolvency Act, No. 111. of 1907, or Section 10(1)(a) of the present Act, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Srimati Pramila Devi vs Chandra Shekhar Chatterji And ...
Judges: Piggott, Walsh
31 January, 1921·JUDGMENT Piggott and Walsh, JJ. 1. The court below had to decide about the granting of a succession certificate for the collection of certain debts due to a decease Bengali Brahmin, Babu Karunamoy Banerji. The rival applicants were a widowed daughter with no children and two sons by another daughter...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ratan Lal vs Birjbhukan Saran
Judges: Tudball, Rafique
31 January, 1921·1. This is a defendants' appeal in a suit brought by the plaintiff to have a certain order passed under Order XXI, Rule VI set aside. It appears that a male was held in execution of a decree and Hari Ram, the father of the plaintiff respondent, bid a very large sure, over Rs. 3,000, for the property...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chaudhri Sheo Bakhsh And Ors. vs Chaudhri Mukhtar Singh
Judges: Tudball, Rafique
31 January, 1921·JUDGMENT 1. This is a defendants-vendees' appeal arising out of a suit for pre emption. The plaintiff is a co-sharer in the mahal, the defendants-vendees are not. The plaintiff alleged a custom, according to which he claimed to be entitled to pre-emption as against the defendants, The defendants ple...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Musammat Jeoni vs Kalloo And Anr.
Judges: Ryves, G Prasad
28 January, 1921·JUDGMENT 1. This appeal arises out of the following circumstances: A Nawab gave a lease of a certain Mahal to two person, the present plaintiff, Msammat Jeoni, and one Mubarak Ali. Mubarak Ali died some time ago leaving a son and a widow, Musammat Jannat, The son has since died and his widow, Jannat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Param Hansman Tewari And Anr. vs Dasrathman Tewari And Anr.
Judges: Piggott, Walsh
27 January, 1921·JUDGMENT 1. This suit was brought in the Court of the Munsif of Deoria. The plaintiffs claimed, between them, to. be the holders of the proprietary rights in respect of a particular plot of land 16 his was in area. They said that this land had never been brought under cultivation, but grew from year...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Buddhoo Lal And Anr. vs Mewa Ram
Judges: Rafique, Piggott, Walsh, Ryves, G Prasad
26 January, 1921·8. Firstly, in drafting the present Code of 'Civil Procedure, Act V of 1908, the Legislature seems to me to have dealt carefully and systematically with the question how far a party to a suit, finding himself aggrieved by any order passed by the trial Court prior to the delivery of the final judgmen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kandhai Pande vs Musammat Dachchina Misirain And ...
Judges: Tudball, Lindsay
25 January, 1921·1. This is a defendant's appeal. The two plaintiffs are the daughters of one Jagdeo Pande who died leaving two widows, Musammat Phu Kunwar and Musammat Hansrani. After his death then two widows on the 2nd of September 1913, made a gift of part of their estate in favour of the two daughters of Jagdeo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lala Ganesh Rai vs Musammat Faizan And Abdul Subhan
Judges: G Prasad
25 January, 1921·JUDGMENT Gokul Prasad, J. 1. This application in revision arises out of a suit brought by the plaintiff, opposite party, for profits against a lambardar. The Assistant Collector came to the conclusion that the defendant was a trespasser in possession and the plaintiff could not claim profits from hi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.