The Union Indian Sugar Mills Co., ... vs Jai Deo
Judges: Walsh, Wallach
10 August, 1921·1. This is a simple matter. Certain property, including the shares in question in a limited liability Company known as the Union Indian Sugar Mills Co., Ltd., having its registered office in Cawnpore, was held by a family jointly. It is alleged by one Debi Dat, who happens to be at this time the Man...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jai Deo vs Union Indian Sugar Mills Company ...
Judges: Walsh, Wallach
10 August, 1921·1. This is a simple matter. Certain property, including the shares in question in a limited liability company known as the Union Indian Sugar Mills Co., Ltd., having its registered office in Cawnpore, was held by a family, jointly. It is alleged by one Debi Dat, who happens to be at this time the ma...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Soti Suraj Mal vs Than Singh
Judges: G Prasad, Stuart
09 August, 1921·2. The defence of Than Singh was that the bond in suit did not create any incumbrance; that the mortgagor had acquired a 5 biswa share under a pre-emption decree before the mortgage in suit; that this share was also included in the mortgage, and has subsequent to the mortgage been purchased by the p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kanhaiya Lal vs Phul Chand And Anr.
Judges: Walsh, Wallach
09 August, 1921·The question, if the term res judicata was intended, as it doubtless was, and was understood by the Full Bench, to refer to a matter decided by a court of competent jurisdiction in a former suit, was irrelevant and inapplicable to the case. The matter decided by Mr. Probyn was not decided in a forme...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Soti Suraj Mal vs Than Singh
Judges: G Prasad, Sturat
09 August, 1921·2. The defence of Than Singh was that the bond in suit did not create any encumbrance, that the mortgagor had acquired a 5 biswas share under a pre-emption decree before the mortgage in suit, that this share was also included in the mortgage, and has subsequent to the mortgage been purchased by the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Parbhu Dayal vs Jamil Ahmad And Anr.
Judges: Tudball, Sulaiman
04 August, 1921·1. This is a plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit for pre-emption. The plaintiff alleged that the amount of Rs. 1,300 entered in the sale deed was fictitious. On behalf of the defendants the custom of pre-emption was denied and it was farther pleaded that an offer had been made to the plaintiff ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheikh Kallu And Anr. vs Nadir Baksh And Anr.
Judges: Walsh, Wallach
04 August, 1921·JUDGMENT 1. This is an order, in our view, entirely without jurisdiction, an order which no Judge ought ever to make, and which there is nothing in the Code to justify. A decree was passed against a defendant, the result of which was that a house, which he says (although it is not yet proved) is his...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Latif-Un-Nissa Bibi vs Said-Ud-Din And Shafi-Un-Nissa ...
Judges: Tudball, Sulaiman
04 August, 1921·1. Second Appeals Nos. 696 and 607 are two appeals arising out of a pre-emption suit. Admittedly the rules of the Muhammadan Law apply to the case. The property in question consisted of zamindari shares in 5 khatas in one mahal. The 5 khatas are Nos. 17, 25, 49, 20 and 48. The plaintiff, the vendee,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Parbhu Dayal vs Jamil Ahmad And Anr.
Judges: Tudball, Sulaiman
04 August, 1921·1. This is a plaintiff's appeal arising out) of a suit for pre-emption. The plaintiff alleged that the amount of Rs. 1,300 entered in the sale-deed was fictitious. On behalf of the defendants the custom of pre-emption was denied and it was further pleaded that an offer had been made to the plaintiff...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Syeeduddin vs Latifunnissa And Musammat ...
Judges: Tudball, Sulaiman
04 August, 1921·1. Second Appeals Nos. 696 and 697 are two appeals arising out of a pre-emption suit. Admittedly the rules of the Muhammadan Law apply to the case. The property in question consisted of Zemindari shares in 5 khatas in one mahal, The 5 khatas are Nos. 17, 25, 49, 29 and 48. The plaintiff, the vendee ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.