Gokaran Singh vs Ganga Singh
Judges: P Banerji, Rafique, Piggott
12 August, 1919·2. It is contended before us on his behalf that no appeal lay to the District Judge. Although he himself raised the plea that the Revenue Court had no jurisdiction, he urges that this was a futile plea, that in reality there was no question of jurisdiction which could 'be decided by the Court of fir...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Tika Ram, Vakil vs Unknown
Judges: P C Banerji, M Rafiq, Piggott
12 August, 1919·JUDGMENT Pramada Charan Banerji, Muhammad Rafiq and Piggott, JJ. 1. This is an application by one Ram Sarup praying that notice be taken of the conduct of Babu Tika Ram, a vakil of this Court, now practising at Agra, it being alleged that he is guilty of professional misconduct. The misconduct imput...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Sarup vs Tika Ram, Vakil
Judges: P Banerji, Rafique, Piggott
12 August, 1919·JUDGMENT 1. This is an application by one Ram Sarup praying that notice be taken of the conduct of Babu Tika Ram, a Vakil of this Court, now practising at Agra, it being alleged that he is guilty of professional misconduct. The misconduct imputed to the Vakil is a violation of Rule 26, Part II, of t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gokaran Singh vs Ganga Singh
Judges: P C Banerji, M Rafiq, Piggott
12 August, 1919·2. There have been some arguments addressed to us upon the merits of the case. On the merits I see no reason to differ from the view taken by the learned Judge of this Court. The defendant was a party to the partition proceedings in his character as a co-sharer. If he claimed the lands now in suit a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Thakur Ganeshi Singh vs Shyam Singh And Anr.
Judges: P Banerji, Piggott
08 August, 1919·1. The facts out of which this appeal arises are these: One Yad Ram made a mortgage of joint ancestral property in favour of Ganeshi Singh appellant on the 8th of February 1897. On the 7th of February 1908 a suit was brought by the mortgagee to enforce the mortgage and the defendants to the suit wer...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Seth Shyam Karan And Ors. vs The Collector Of Benares
Judges: P Banerji, Piggott
08 August, 1919·JUDGMENT 1. This and the connected appeal arise out of execution proceedings in connection with a simple decree for money passed on the 18th of December 1897. Various applications for execution were made between that year and the year 1906. In 1905 the' property of the judgement-debtor in the Distri...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiam Karan And Ors. vs The Collector Of Benares
Judges: P C Bangrji, Piggott
08 August, 1919·JUDGMENT Pramada Charan Banerji and Piggott, JJ. 1. This and the connected appeal arise out of execution proceedings in connection with a simple decree for money passed on the 18th of December, 1897. Various applications for execution were made between that year and the year 1906; In 1905 the proper...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gaj Kumar Chander vs Syed Salamat Ali And Anr.
Judges: Stuart, Wallach
06 August, 1919·JUDGMENT 1. The decision of this revision has been referred to a Bench of two Judges in view of the difference of opinion between the Judges who decided Parbhu Narain Singh v. Harbans Lal 36 Ind. Cas. 279 : 14 A.L.J. 261. The point is this. Does a revision under Section 115, Civil Procedure Code, li...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Pandit Amrita Lal, Mukhtar ... vs Unknown
Judges: Rafique, Stuart, Wallach
06 August, 1919·1. A notice has been issued to Pandit Amrita Lal, Mukhtar, by a Full Bench of this Court on a report of the District Judge of Gorakhpur, dated the 17th of April 1919, to show cause why the report made against him should not be accepted and why proper orders should not be passed against him under Sec...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gaj Kumar Chandar vs Salamat Ali And Anr.
Judges: Stuart, Wallach
06 August, 1919·JUDGMENT Stuart and Wallach, JJ. 1. The decision of this revision has been referred to a Bench of two Judges in view of the difference of opinion between the Judges who decided Parbhu Narain Singh, Kashi Naresh v. Harbans Lal (1916) 14 A.L.J. 281 (291). The point is this. Does a revision under Secti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.