Baldeva vs Panna Lal
Judges: A Raoof
14 June, 1918·JUDGMENT Abdul Raoof, J. 1. Bohra Panna Lal the plaintiff in this case brought this suit against Baldeva Teli upon the following allegations: In paragraph 1 of the plaint he stated that the plaintiff was a zemindar co-sharer and also a lambardar in Mauza Maholi Shamshergunj, Tahsil Bhagaon district ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pahladi Lal vs Musammat Laraiti And Ors.
Judges: Piggott, Walsh
10 June, 1918·JUDGMENT Piggott and Walsh, JJ. 1. We have come to the conclusion that this appeal must be allowed and the suit sent back for re-trial. The Suit is brought upon two simple mortgage bonds by the plaintiff against the widow of one Bijai Singh, Bijai Singh borrowed two sums--one of Rs. 6,000 and the ot...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pahladi Lal vs Musammat Laraiti And Ors.
Judges: Piggott, Walsh
10 June, 1918·JUDGMENT 1. We have come to the con-elusion that this appeal must be allowed and the suit sent back for re-trial. The suit is brought upon two simple mortgage-bonds by the plaintiff against the widow of one Bijai Singh. Bijai Singh borrowed two sums, one of Rs. 6,000 and the other of Rs. 1,000, in t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nur-Ud-Din Khan vs Pran Kishan Chakravarty And Anr.
Judges: P Banerji, Ryves
07 June, 1918·JUDGMENT 1. This appeal has been preferred under the following circumstance A suit was brought by the appellant for dissolution of partnership and for the taking of partnership accounts. The matter was referred to arbitration, and an award was made which was accepted by the Court and in accordance w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mata Badal Singh And Ors. vs Gourish Narain Singh And Anr.
Judges: Tudball, A Raoof
07 June, 1918·JUDGMENT 1. This second appeal arises out of a suit brought for the resumption of a muafi, khidmati. It has been decreed by both the Courts below. In the Court of first instance a plea was taken that the plaintiffs had no right to sue for resumption. That plea was decided in favour of the plaintiffs...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gourish Narain Singh And Anr. vs Matabadal Singh And Anr.
Judges: Tudball, A Raoof
07 June, 1918·JUDGMENT Tudball, and Abdul Raoof, JJ. 1. The second appeal arisen out of a suit brought for the resumption of a muafi khidmati. It has been decreed by both the courts below. In the Court of first instance a plea was taken that the plaintiffs had no right to sue for resumption. That plea was decided...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kunj Behari Lal vs Laltu Singh And Ors.
Judges: Piggott, Walsh
06 June, 1918·3. In this connection we were also asked on behalf of the respondent to attach considerable importance to the fact that Rani Kishori Kuar had taken the estate in succession to her son, and not immediately on "the death of her husband." Under the circumstances of the case, I do not think this fact is...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Naim-Ul-Haq vs Muhammad Subhan-Ullah
Judges: Piggott, Walsh
05 June, 1918·3. Strictly speaking the questions raised in the pleadings (a) and (d) above set forth are in their nature preliminary to the consideration of the appeal on its merits, as the questions raised in pleading (b) and (c) could not arise if point (a) were decided in favour of the appellant or point (d) i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ratan Moti vs Tilak Chand And Ors.
Judges: P Banerji, Ryves
04 June, 1918·JUDGMENT 1. This and the connected Appeal No. 1065 of 1916 arise out of a suit brought by Musammat Ratan Moti for a declaration that a sale-deed executed by Jagan Lal, defendant No. 3, in favour of Tilak Chand and Hushiar Singh, defendants Nos. 1 and 2, on the 14th of February 1911 is null and void ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.