Musammat Fatima Bibi And Ors. vs Ram Narain Sahu And Ors.
Judges: Piggott, Walsh
06 April, 1918·4. Secondly, it is contended that, even if execution be proved against any or all of the other executants, there has been no valid registration of the document as against any of the executants other than Jamil Ullah. 5. Thirdly, it is contended that, in any event, the decree should have been for the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Narain Sahu And Ors. vs Musleha Bibi And Ors.
Judges: Piggott, Walsh
06 April, 1918·4. Secondly.--It is contended that, even if execution be proved against any or all of the other executants, there has been no valid registration of the document as against any of the executants other than Jamil-ullah. 5. Thirdly.--It is contended that, in any event, the decree should have been for t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Deo Saran Tewari vs Emperor
Judges: P Banerji
04 April, 1918·JUDGMENT 1. The accused in this case was convicted under Section 174, Indian Penal Code, on a charge of non-attendance in the Court of Mr. W. Gurney in obedience to a lawful summons. The case was tried by Mr. Gurney himself and he convicted the accused and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 10. This pro...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chaturi Singh vs Musamaut Rania And Anr.
Judges: P C Banerji, Tudball
03 April, 1918·1. This application for revision arises under the following circumstances. A suit to recover Rs. 273 upon a bond was instituted in court of the first Additional Subordinate Judge of Aligarh, who was invested with the jurisdiction of a Court of Small Causes to try suits cognizable by a Court of Small...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chaturi Singh vs Ramia And Anr.
Judges: P Banerji, Tudball
03 April, 1918·1. This application for revision arises under the following circumstances. A suit to recover Rs. 273 upon a bond was instituted in the Court of the first Additional Subordinate Judge of Aligarh who was invested with the jurisdiction of a Court of Small Causes to try suits cognizable by a Court of Sm...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nathu And Anr. vs Musammat Tulsha
Judges: H Richards, P Banerji
02 April, 1918·JUDGMENT 1. We think the view taken by the Court below was correct on the findings of fact arrived at by it. Assuming that there was a debt due by Gillay which it was the legal and pious duty of the widow to discharge, that debt was discharged by Kunji taking over the liability and agreeing to pay i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.