Jagarnath Gir vs Tirguna Nand And Ors.
Judges: H Richards, P Banerji
21 January, 1915·1. This appeal arises out of a suit in which the plaintiff claimed a declaration that he was entitled to certain mutt property as the mahant thereof in succession to the last mahant. It appears that the last mahant, one Narain Gir, was a minor and that the property was taken over by the Court of War...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Imperlal Bank vs Indar Pal And Anr.
Judges: Tudball, Piggott
19 January, 1915·(1) That there had been a partition in July, 1910, i.e., just after the Bank's decree had been obtained, under which Moti Lal had separated, leaving his sons still joint with his brother and therefore the attached property was not liable. (2) That the liability of the son's share was res judicata be...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Municipal Committee Of Ajmere vs Kifayatullah
Judges: Chamier, Piggott
19 January, 1915·JUDGMENT 1. This is a reference by the Commissioner of Ajmere-Merwara under Section 18 of the Ajmere Courts Regulation, I of 1877. The facts stated in the reference are that one Kifayatullah on July 23rd, 1907, gave the Municipal Committee of Ajmere notice in writing of his intention to re-erect a c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Indar Pal And Anr. vs The Imperial Bank
Judges: Tudball, Piggott
19 January, 1915·4. It was again put into execution as this did not satisfy the decree against Moti Lal and the decree-holder sought to put the remaining five-sixth share to sale. The brother, Babu Lal, and the two sons both tiled objections. Those of Babu Lal wore allowed and his share released. 5. The objections o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kifayatullah vs Municipal Board Of Ajmere
Judges: Chamier, Piggott
19 January, 1915·JUDGMENT Chamier and Piggott, JJ. 1. This is a reference by the Commissioner of Ajmere-Merwara, under Section 18 of the Ajmere Courts Regulation I of 1877. The facts stated in the reference are that one Kifayatullah on the 23rd of July, 1907, gave the Municipal Committee of Ajmere notice in writing ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Musammat Dulari And Anr. vs Lal Bahadur Singh
Judges: Piggott
18 January, 1915·JUDGMENT Piggott, J. 1. This was a suit for redemption of a usufructuary mortgage, dated March 14th, 1898. The suit was instituted on the 19th of July 1912. It has been dismissed by the District Judge, on the ground that it was premature as the terms of the deed provided for redemption only after th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bachcha And Ors. vs Shiam Lal
Judges: H Richards, P Banerji
16 January, 1915·JUDGMENT 1. This appeal arises out of a suit in which the plaintiffs claimed that they were the Muhammadan residents of a hamlet known as Rasulabad and that they had a right to place, their tazias on a particular platform in front of the house once owned by one Mohan. It appears that for many years ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagwan Dayal And Anr. vs Param Sukh Das
Judges: H Richards, P C Banerji
14 January, 1915·1. This appeal arises out of a suit in which the plaintiffs claimed a declaration that a decree obtained against them ex parte on the 30th of August, 1911, was null and void as against them. The decree in question was a decree obtained on foot of a mortgage alleged to have been executed by the fathe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhola Nath vs Renka And Anr. And Nannhu Mal And ...
Judges: H Richards, P C Benerji
13 January, 1915·1. In the suit out of which this appeal arises the plaintiff is the alleged reversioner to the estate of one Sewa Ram, upon the death of his widow Musammat Renka, the defendant of the first party. The defendants of the second party are alleged to be the nephews of the Musammat on whom she has confer...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gaya Prasad Tewari And Ors. vs Ram Phal Misir
Judges: H Richards, P Banerji
13 January, 1915·1. This appeal arises out of a suit on foot of a mortgage, dated the 19th of May 1899. The principal amount was Rs. 722. The interest was 1-8, per cent, per month, compound interest, with annual rests. The claim has now swelled to the large sum of Rs. 6,207-6-0. The Court below has held that the ful...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.