Raghunandan Prasad vs Sheo Prasad
Judges: H Griffin, Chamier
11 March, 1913·1. The appellant and the respondent were rival candidates for a seat on the municipal board of Bareilly at an election held on the 18th of March, 1911. The respondent having been declared to have been duly elected, the appellant on the 24th of March, contested the validity of the election by a petit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheo Chaudhri And Ors. vs Sadho Das
Judges: Banerji
10 March, 1913·JUDGMENT Banerji, J. 1. This was a suit for possession of property left by one Madho, who has been found to have been separate from the other members of his family. It has also been found that the property in question was Madho's separate property and was acquired by him. Madho died in 1899, leaving...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sahib Dyal Singh And Ors. vs Musammat Auliyai Bibi And Ors.
Judges: Tudball, Rafique
10 March, 1913·1. This appeal arises out of the following circumstances: 2. The decree-holders who are the appellants here finally obtained a decree on the 18th of December 1902 and on the 28th of January 1905 applied for execution of the decree by sale of certain ancestral property belonging to the judgment-debto...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Soni Ram vs Kanhaiya Lal
Judges: Shaw, Moulton, J Edge, A Ali
06 March, 1913·5. Khushwakt Rai, the original mortgagee, died shortly before 1855, leaving surviving him his widow, Musammat Jamna, who died on the 10th of May, 1866, and a daughter Musammat Janki, who died on the 30th of May, 1898. Babu Charan Behari Lal and Lala Shib Shankar Lal, who were the plaintiffs in the s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anrut Rai And Ors. vs Jaleshar Rai And Ors.
Judges: G Knox, M Rafiq
04 March, 1913·3. On the 13th of February, 1910, eighteen years after the decree obtained against Payag Rai and thirteen years after the sale of his share, the plaintiffs respondents brought the suit out of which this appeal has arisen in the court of the Subordinate Judge of Azamgarh against the sons and grandson...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sumera vs Birham Khushal
Judges: Tudball, M Rafiq
04 March, 1913·JUDGMENT Tudball and Muhammad Rafiq, JJ. 1. This appeal arises out of a suit, which was originally brought by the plaintiff Sumera in the Munsif's court, first, to have it declared that he was the son and lawful heir of one Jhau, deceased, and, as such, was entitled to the possession of a certain oc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yusuf Ali Beg vs Ayub Beg
Judges: H Griffin, Chamier
04 March, 1913·1. This was a suit by the appellant for a share in the property of his father, Umar Daraz Beg, who died on May 11th, 1399. It appears that Umar Daraz was the owner of some property which he transferred by a deed of gift to his wife, Musammat Nijabat Begam. She died in 1899, leaving her husband, two ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jaleshwar Rai And Ors. vs Anrut Rai And Ors.
Judges: G Knox, Rafique
04 March, 1913·2. On the 18th of August 1896, the first five defendants-appellants, the sons of Payag Rai, instituted a suit against the mortgagees for a declaration that the decree obtained by the latter against Payag Rai was not binding on them as they were not parties to it and that their share in the mortgaged...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Mahant Bramha Khushal vs Sumera
Judges: Tudball, Rafique
04 March, 1913·1. This appeal arises out of a suit, which was originally brought by the plaintiff, Sumera, in the Munsif's Court, first, to have it declared that he was the son and lawful heir of one Jhan deceased and as such was entitled to the possession of a certain occupancy holding left by Jhan, and, secondly...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Ghafur vs Ghulam Husain And Anr.
Judges: H Griffin, Chamier
03 March, 1913·1. This was a suit by the appellant for possession of a share in patti Mumtaz-ud-din in mahal Fakir Bakhsh, mauza Mani Umarpur. This share was put up for sale on the 20th of September, 1910, in execution of a decree of a civil court. The plaintiff's bid was Rs. 530. The respondents offered the same ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.