Ram Charan Lal And Ors. vs Muhammad Rashid-Ud-Din And Ors.
Judges: K Husain, Tudball
17 June, 1912·JUDGMENT 1. This was a suit by the representatives-in-interest of a subsequent mortgagee for sale upon his mortgage, dated the 20th of August 1895. The plaintiffs did not make the prior mortgagee, Mohi-ud-din Haider, a defendant to the suit, nor did they make Lachhmi Narain and others, sons of Gopal...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Fakir Chand vs Kewal Ram And Anr.
Judges: Chamier
14 June, 1912·1. The facts found are that Manga, who was owner of a house in a village, died leaving a widow who held possession for some years. On the death of the widow, the plaintiffs became entitled to the house as zemindars of the village, Manga having left no heirs besides his widow. The defendant-appellant...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheo Partab Singh And Ors. vs Brij Kishore And Ors.
Judges: H Richards, K C, Tudball
14 June, 1912·1. This appeal arises out of a suit to recover money. The plaintiffs allege that there was a contract between themselves and the defendants that the plaintiffs should purchase grain for the defendants and store it in their godown, that the defendants should pay interest on the outlay, make a deposit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Muhammad Ibrahim vs Ram Kishun Rai And Anr.
Judges: Chamier
13 June, 1912·1. The facts of this case are that one Jobraj Rai sold part of his share in a village to the predecessor of the plaintiff in 1875 and sold the remainder of the share to the defendants in 1881. 2. Jobraj Rai became ex-proprietary tenant of 12 bighas odd which included the three plots now in suit. Job...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramlal And Ors. vs Bachcha Singh And Anr.
Judges: Chamier
13 June, 1912·1. This was a suit for foreclosure upon an unregistered mortgage made by the respondent. Ram Prasad, in favour of the respondent, Bachcha Singh, in March 1896. The mortgage was without possession. The mortgaged property-was brought to sale in 1905, in execution of a simple money decree passed agains...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhaia Sheoraj Singh vs Sampat Singh And Ors.
Judges: Banerji
12 June, 1912·JUDGMENT Banerji, J. 1. The plaintiff appellant brought the suit out of which this appeal has arisen for a declaration of his title to a one-anna share of zemindari which under partition has now been declared to be a sixteen-anna mahal and a house This property stood recorded in the names of Musamma...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jangli Sahu vs Gopinath Sahu And Ors.
Judges: K Husain, Tudball
11 June, 1912·JUDGMENT 1. This was a suit upon a mortgage which was decreed by the first Court. Jangli Sahu, one of the defendants, appealed but did not make Har Sewak Man Tewari, the mortgagor, and Jagai Tewari, a subsequent mortgagee, respondents to the appeal. His case was that he was a purchaser of the proper...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Musammat Nauli And Anr. vs Kheri And Ors.
Judges: K Husain, Tudball
11 June, 1912·7. In the course of this appeal, we are asked to accept the lower Court's finding that the plaintiffs are Punjabi Jats and our attention has been called to the reports of various Settlement Officers in several districts of the Punjab in which the custom is said to exist in those districts among Jats...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Inayat Khan vs Muhammad Yusuf
Judges: Banerji
10 June, 1912·JUDGMENT Banerji, J. 1. This appeal arises out of a claim for pre emption based on Muhammadan Law. The suit was also based on custom, but the Courts below found that the alleged custom was not proved, so that the claim is one under the Muhammadan Law, and the only question in, whether the requiremen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ali Husain vs Amin-Ullah
Judges: K Husain, Tudball
10 June, 1912·JUDGMENT Karamat Husain and Tudball, JJ. 1. The pre-emptor succeeded in his suit for pre-emption. The first court ordered him to deposit Rs. 6,800. He carried out the order of the court. Subsequently, in execution of his own decree for costs, he attached and got a sum of Rs. 314-8-0, out of the sum ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.