Hira Singh And Anr. vs Musammat Amarti
Judges: H Griffin, Chamier
29 February, 1912·7. The Court further held that the execution of the bond was admitted by implication. 8. The question whether the plaintiffs were entitled to produce secondary evidence of the bond in suit does not. appear to have been argued before the Court below. The appeal to that Court having been allowed the p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hira Singh And Anr. vs Musammat Amarti
Judges: H Griffin, Chamier
29 February, 1912·3. Subject to the provisions contained in sections 4 to 25 (inclusive), every suit instituted, appeal preferred, and application made, after the period of limitation prescribed there for by the first schedule, shall be dismissed, although limitation has not been set up as a defence. 4. Where the per...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Balwant Singh vs R. Clancy And Maharaj Singh
Judges: Shaw, Robson, J Edge, A Ali
28 February, 1912·3. Sheoraj Singh was the sole mortgagor, and, by the deed of mortgage, Sheoraj Singh, declaring that he was the absolute owner in possession of the several villages, lands, hereditaments, and premises in the deed mentioned, and that there was no sharer in the said property, purported to mortgage the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Musammat Mithani vs Emperor
Judges: G Knox
28 February, 1912·1. This is an application for revision. It appears that Musammat Mithani brought a complaint against one Ganga Pershad charging him with an offence under Section 406, Indian Penal Code. The complaint was filed in the Court of one Saiyed Abu Muhammad, who is said to have been at the time Magistrate i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagwan Das vs Raj Nath
Judges: K Husain, Tudball
26 February, 1912·1. One Kishori Lal was the owner of the property in dispute and other property. On the 5th of August, 1888, he made a simple mortgage of all those properties in favour of Nizam-ud-din. Subsequently, on the 22nd of December, 1888, he mortgaged them to Kirpa Dial and others who, on their mortgage, obt...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagwan Das vs Raj Nath
Judges: K Husain, Tudball
26 February, 1912·1. One Kishori Lal was the owner of the property in dispute and other property. On the 5th of August, 1888, he made a simple mortgage of all those properties in favour of Nizam-ud-din. Subsequently, on the 22nd of December, 1888, he mortgaged them to Kirpa Dayal and others, who obtained a decree on ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheoambar Ahir And Ors. vs The Collector Of Azamgarh And Ors.
Judges: H Richards, Banerji, Tudball
24 February, 1912·3. In my opinion, the suit was cognizable in the Civil Court. Prima facie the Civil Court is the Court to decide all cases of a civil nature. Only cases which by express enactment are withdrawn from the cognizance of the Civil Court are not triable by that Court. It is argued that Section 95 read wi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ayesha And Ors. vs Faiyaz Husain And Musammat Kulsum
Judges: K Husain, Tudball
24 February, 1912·JUDGMENT Karamat Husain and Tudrall, JJ. 1. This was a suit by Faiyaz Husain against his wife, her mother and brother and a fourth party, for restitution of conjugal rights and for a perpetual injunction against defendants Nos. 2, 3 and 4 restraining them from offering any interference as might prev...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheoambar Ahir And Ors. vs The Collector Of Azamgarh And Ors.
Judges: H Richards, Banerji, Tudball
24 February, 1912·3. In my opinion the suit was cognizable in the civil court. Prima facie the civil court is the court to decide all cases of a civil nature. Only cases which by express enactment are withdrawn from the cognizance of the civil court are not triable by that court. It is argued that Section 95 read wit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ayesha And Ors. vs Fiaz Husain
Judges: K Husain, Tudball
24 February, 1912·JUDGMENT 1. This was a suit by Faiyaz Hmain against his wife, her mother and brother and a fourth party, for restitution of conjugal rights and for perpetual injunction against defendants Nos. 2, 3 and 4, restraining them from offering any interference as might prevent Musammat Kulsum, defendant No....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.