The Maharaja Of Benares vs Daljit Singh And Ors.
Judges: Banerji
30 March, 1897·JUDGMENT Banerji, J. 1. This appeal must prevail, and the learned vakil for the respondent has frankly conceded that he cannot support the judgment of the Lower Appellate Court. The facts which gave rise to the suit were these. One Thakur Dayal Singh was a tenant at fixed rates of the plaintiff appe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Brij Mohan Das vs Mannu Bibi And Anr.
Judges: J Edge, Kt, Blair, Banerji, Aikman
23 March, 1897·3. In Huro Chunder Roy v. Surnamoyi I.L.R. 13 Cal. 266, the learned Judges decided, with regard to Section 5, as to what is sufficient cause, that it is for the Judge in each case to exercise his discretion having regard to the particular facts established before him, and they declined to hold that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Collector Of Dehra Dun vs The Crown Brewery
Judges: Knox, Burkitt
17 March, 1897·1. The value of the land, trees, &c.? This was a perfectly proper issue and the only one that arose in the case. The next two issues were: 2.The right to the water, i.e., could the claimants claim a right to it against Government? 3. If so, the value of the water right? 3. These two issues did not a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Muhammad Mahmud vs Siyadat-Un-Nissa
Judges: Banerji, Aikman
17 March, 1897·1. The only question to be determined in this second appeal is whether the appeal preferred to the Lower Appellate Court by the present appellant was or was not barred by the law of limitation. In order to understand that question it is necessary to state a few dates. The decree of the Court of Firs...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Madho Prasad vs Kesho Prasad
Judges: J Edge, Kt, Blair
15 March, 1897·1. This appeal arises in the execution of a decree. The decree was passed on the 25th of January 1878. On the 9th of January 1879,the first application was made for execution. On the 19th of March 1880, the second application was made. On the 8th of June 1880, the third application was made. After t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Muhammad Yusuf vs Muhammad Yunus Khan And Anr.
Judges: Banerji, Aikman
12 March, 1897·1. The suit out of which this appeal has arisen was brought by the respondent to enforce his right of pre-emption in respect of the sale of a house and compound, made in favour of the appellants on the 27th of June 1893. The plaintiff is the owner of an adjoining house, and he founded his claim on M...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nand Kishore vs Lalji Mal
Judges: J Edge, Kt, Blair
12 March, 1897·1. Lalji Mal purchased from the judgment-debtors some immovable property whilst it was under attachment in execution of a decree. Application was sub-sequently made to bring that property to sale in execution of the decree. Lalji Mal filed an objection under Section 278 of the Code of Civil Procedur...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Thakur Raghunathji Maharaj vs Shah Lal Chand
Judges: J Edge, Kt, Blair
11 March, 1897·1. This suit, which relates to property alleged to belong to a temple, was brought in the name of the idol of the temple--"Thakur Raghunathji Maharaj, seated in the temple at Ramghat, Pargana Anupshahr in the Bulandshahr district, through Saligram, son of Raghunath, Manager and Superintendent of the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.