Queen-Empress vs Pirbhu And Ors.
Judges: J Edge, Kt, Aikman
27 April, 1895·1. Pirbhu and seven other men who were convicted of the offence punishable under a. 396 of the Indian Penal Code have appealed One of them" Gobind, was convicted of abetting. The dacoity in Son was one which was carried out by some 22 or 25 men They came under different leaders and from different di...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Naraini Kuar vs Makhan Lal And Ors.
Judges: J Edge, Kt, Banerji
25 April, 1895·1. This was a suit for possession, and the plaintiff claimed by right of inheritance to her father. Her father died on the 18th of October 1879, and on the 21st of September 1891 the plaintiff presented an application, under Section 403 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for permission to sue as a paup...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagwati Prasad And Anr. vs Sheobarat Kuari And Anr.
Judges: J Edge, Kt, Banerji
18 April, 1895·JUDGMENT John Edge, Kt., C.J. and Banerji, J. 1. The only question in this case is whether the plaintiffs were reversioners. If they were reversioners, they were entitled to maintain the suit. The last owner of the property was one Sheo Charan. He died leaving a widow, who made a deed of gift in fav...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ranjit Singh vs Jafer Husain
Judges: J Edge, Kt, Banerji
17 April, 1895·JUDGMENT John Edge, Kt., C.J. and Banerji, J. 1. Pandit Sundar Lal, for the appellant, has withdrawn this appeal. It had been, as a matter of fact, called on, but it had not been argued or opened when Pandit Sundar Lal elected to withdraw. The appeal is accordingly withdrawn. The respondent to the a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahabir Singh And Anr. vs Saira Bibi And Anr.
Judges: J Edge, Kt, Banerji
17 April, 1895·1. The plaintiffs in the suit in which this appeal has arisen were usufructuary mortgagees under a mortgage of the 19th of June 1883, which had been made in their favor by the defendants in the suit or by those under whom they claimed. The plaintiffs had been kept out of possession of the mortgaged ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Muir Mills Company vs The Elgin Mills Company
Judges: Knox, Aikman
16 April, 1895·5. There is not in Act No. V of 1888 any definition of the term "invention." All that the Act says is to be found in Section 4, Clause (1), where it is laid down that the term "invention" includes an improvement. Nor is much help to be derived from English Patent Law. In Section 46 of the Patent Des...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Rahmat-Ullah vs Unknown
Judges: J Edge, Kt, Banerji, Burkitt
05 April, 1895·2. To refer to the other portion of the order. Mr. Reid at first contended that the Magistrate would have jurisdiction under Section 144 to restrain a man from executing a Civil Court decree, if he was not satisfied that the man was rightfully Sled to execute the decree in the way in which it was be...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lalta Prasad vs Ram Ratan And Ors.
Judges: J Edge, Kt, Banerji
03 April, 1895·1. The suit in which this appeal has arisen was brought in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Moradabad. It was a suit for sale under Section 88 of Act No. IV of 1882. A very small portion of the property mortgaged, viz., 50 square yards, was situate in the district of Moradabad. It is said, but ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.