Home Page

Judgments

High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench

The Lucknow high court was established in 1948. The creation of the Lucknow Bench made the court more accessible for people in eastern Uttar Pradesh, saving them from travelling long distances to Allahabad.

Lucknow Bench, Allahabad High Court

The Lucknow High Court is located in the capital city of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow. The exact address of the Lucknow Bench is provided below: 

<i>Vikramaditya Marg, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226010</i>

Location of Lucknow Bench, Allahabad High Court 

The Jurisdiction of Lucknow High Court is one of India's oldest high courts reigning over the state of Uttar Pradesh.

Jurisdiction of Lucknow High Court 

The Lucknow High Court judgement list has several landmark judgments and decisions over the years. Here are some important ones:

In 1971, Indira Gandhi, the former Prime Minister of India, emerged victorious in the parliamentary elections from the Rai Bareilly constituency. Her opponent was the socialist leader Raj Narain, who contested her election by alleging electoral malpractices and violation of the Representation of People Act, 1951.

On 12 June 1975, the Allahabad High Court, presided over by Justice Jagmohanlal Sinha, pronounced its judgement. The court found Indira Gandhi guilty of all the charges and declared her election invalid. Consequently, she was disqualified from holding any electoral position and prohibited from participating in elections for a period of six years. However, the Supreme Court intervened and granted a stay on the verdict. Eventually, the Supreme Court overturned the previous decision.

Important Lucknow Bench, Allahabad High Court Judgments 

Judges of High Court

The Lucknow high court in Uttar Pradesh can have 119 main judges and 41 more judges, making a total of 160 judges. Right now, there are 100 judges working there.

Number of Judges Present

The process  begins with the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and the Union Minister of Law and Justice receiving proposals from the chief justice of the High Court and other sources, such as lawyers, bar associations, and other judges.

A panel of judges, led by the Chief Justice of India (CJI), evaluates the received proposals. The panel assesses various aspects like seniority, merit, and regional representation to shortlist candidates.

Once the shortlist is ready, the panel consults the Chief Minister and Governor of the state concerned and takes their views into account.

The names of the shortlisted candidates are sent to the Intelligence Bureau (IB) for a background check.

After IB clearance, the panel takes a final decision on appointments and sends it to the President of India for approval.

The President of India then issues the warrant of appointment, and the judges are sworn in by the Chief Justice of the High Court.

Judges Appointment Procedure 

Judges of Lucknow Bench, Allahabad High Court

Stay updated with Lucknow High Court orders and judgments from the prestigious Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. Access insightful legal decisions and stay informed.

Lucknow High Court Judgements | Allahabad HC Lucknow Bench

Trust Libra Judgements as your ultimate guide to the Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court judgments, empowering you with knowledge for a stronger legal foundation. Discover groundbreaking judgments that shape the legal landscape of Lucknow. Go through various judgments based on criteria like the year, month, judges, and many more and download judgments when needed.

Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. Case called out in the revised list. None appears for the petitioner to press the petition. Sri Upendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents is present. The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 16.1.2023 Arun K. Singh (Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 27876 of 2016 Petitioner :- Smt Shalini Srivastava Respondent :- Principal Judge Family Court Lko And Anr Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Chandra Verma Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. Case called out in the revised list. None appears for the petitioner to press the petition. The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 16.1.2023 Arun K. Singh (Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judic

Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. Case called out in the revised list. None appears for the petitioner to press the petition. Sri  Ghanshyam  Chaudhary,  learned  Standing  Counsel appearing for the State respondents is present. The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 16.1.2023 Arun K. Singh (Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 28172 of 2016 Petitioner :- Rais Ahmad And Others Respondent :- Civil Judge S.D.Court No.15 District Sultanpur And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rama Kant,Manoj Kumar Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. Case called out in the revised list. None appears for the petitioners to press the petition. The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 16.1.2023 Arun K. Singh (Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH H

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 28536 of 2016 Petitioner :- Sabharaji And Ors Respondent :- Civil Judge J.D Haweli Faizabad And Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Sahu Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. Case called out in the revised list. None appears for the petitioners to press the petition. The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 16.1.2023 Arun K. Singh (Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allaha

Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to take recourse to the remedy available under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. However, it is directed that in case the p

Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. Heard Sri Hanumant Lal Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Upendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 5. Present petition has been filed as a Public Interest Litigation seeking to raise a grievance with regard to the alleged illegal encroachment over land bearing gata no. 692 situate at Village Haliyapur, Pargana Isauli, Tehsil Baldirai, District Sultan

High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench - 2023