Rajendrasinh Natvarsinh Parmars vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: Sonia Gokani
24 September, 2012·1. Application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant in connection with CR.No.I-48 of 2012 and CR.No.I-49 of 2012 registered with Dharampur police station for the offences punishable under Sections 408, 465, 467,468,471 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code d...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajendrasinh Natvarsinh Parmars vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: Sonia Gokani
24 September, 2012·1. Application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant in connection with CR.No.I-48 of 2012 and CR.No.I-49 of 2012 registered with Dharampur police station for the offences punishable under Sections 408, 465, 467,468,471 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code d...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chintan Narhari Vyas & 1S vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: Sonia Gokani
24 September, 2012·1. The applicants have been arrested in connection with Cr.No.I-34 of 2012 registered with Anjar police station for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 120-B and 114 of the Indian Penal Code.2. It is the case of the prosecution that the applicant and the complainant have been friends for the...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat
Judges: Paresh, A L Dave
24 September, 2012·The appellant, accused No.1 before City Sessions Court, Ahmedabad in Sessions Case No.10 of 2003 along with two others viz., Rajaram Krishnamurti Vinjun and Rakesh Rajaram Vinjun, were tried as accused No.2 and accused No.3 respectively. The Sessions Case was disposed of by judgment dated 14/10/...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat Opponents
Judges: M R Shah
24 September, 2012·1.0 Present appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the appellantoriginal accused challenging the impugned judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch camp at Ankleshwar passed in Sess...
High Court Of Gujarat
Saurashtra Patidar Social Trust ... vs Surat
Judges:
24 September, 2012·Ms.Ketty A. Mehta, learned advocate for the petitioner is present. However, as learned advocate for respondents Nos.1 and 2 is not present, the matter is adjourned to 27.12.2012.In order dated 24.09.2012, the direction to maintain status-quo as regards use as well as construction as shown at Annexur...
High Court Of Gujarat
Brijrajba G Jadeja vs State Of Gujarat & 2
Judges:
24 September, 2012·Fresh notice is ordered to be issued to the respondents returnable on 15/10/2012. Learned APP Mr. H. L. Jani waives service of notice for respondent no.1-State. Direct service is permitted for respondent nos.2 and 3.(RAJESH H. SHUKLA, J.) (ila)...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vadodara Municipal Corporation vs Mahadev Sambhaji Indulkar
Judges:
24 September, 2012·This matter was called out twice. None has remain present for the petitioner. Hence dismissed for default. Rule discharged. Interim relief granted earlier shall stand vacated. No costs.[ S.R. BRAHMBHATT, J ] /vgn...
High Court Of Gujarat
In vs Unknown
Judges:
24 September, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) Taking into consideration the nature of controversy, it is directed that this appeal should be listed after Admiralty Suit is heard and disposed of.(RAVI R.TRIPATHI, J.) (N.V. ANJARIA, J.) (SN DEVU PPS)...
High Court Of Gujarat
Trivedi Ketki Digant & 9 vs State Of Guajart Through ...
Judges:
24 September, 2012·Office is directed to list the following matters along with captioned matters on 15.10.2012.1. Special Civil Application No. 6453 of 20112. Special Civil Application No. 6599 of 20113. Special Civil Application No. 6969 of 20114. Special Civil Application No. 6970 of 20115. Special Civil Application...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.