Balkrishna Markandray Trivedis vs Bank Of Baroda Through Chairman And Managing Director & 1
Judges: Ks Jhaveri
26 September, 2012·1. Rule. Mr. Darshan Parikh, learned advocate appearing for the respondents waives service of notice of Rule. With the consent of parties the petitions are taken up for final hearing today. Heard learned advocates for both the sides at length.2. By way of filing these petitions, the petitioners hav...
High Court Of Gujarat
Balkrishna Markandray Trivedis vs Bank Of Baroda Through Chairman And Managing Director & 1
Judges: Ks Jhaveri
26 September, 2012·1. Rule. Mr. Darshan Parikh, learned advocate appearing for the respondents waives service of notice of Rule. With the consent of parties the petitions are taken up for final hearing today. Heard learned advocates for both the sides at length.2. By way of filing these petitions, the petitioners hav...
High Court Of Gujarat
Balkrishna Markandray Trivedis vs Bank Of Baroda Through Chairman And Managing Director & 1
Judges: Ks Jhaveri
26 September, 2012·1. Rule. Mr. Darshan Parikh, learned advocate appearing for the respondents waives service of notice of Rule. With the consent of parties the petitions are taken up for final hearing today. Heard learned advocates for both the sides at length.2. By way of filing these petitions, the petitioners hav...
High Court Of Gujarat
Balkrishna Markandray Trivedis vs Bank Of Baroda Through Chairman And Managing Director & 1
Judges: Ks Jhaveri
26 September, 2012·1. Rule. Mr. Darshan Parikh, learned advocate appearing for the respondents waives service of notice of Rule. With the consent of parties the petitions are taken up for final hearing today. Heard learned advocates for both the sides at length.2. By way of filing these petitions, the petitioners hav...
High Court Of Gujarat
Balkrishna Markandray Trivedis vs Bank Of Baroda Through Chairman And Managing Director & 1
Judges: Ks Jhaveri
26 September, 2012·1. Rule. Mr. Darshan Parikh, learned advocate appearing for the respondents waives service of notice of Rule. With the consent of parties the petitions are taken up for final hearing today. Heard learned advocates for both the sides at length.2. By way of filing these petitions, the petitioners hav...
High Court Of Gujarat
Balkrishna Markandray Trivedis vs Bank Of Baroda Through Chairman And Managing Director & 1
Judges: Ks Jhaveri
26 September, 2012·1. Rule. Mr. Darshan Parikh, learned advocate appearing for the respondents waives service of notice of Rule. With the consent of parties the petitions are taken up for final hearing today. Heard learned advocates for both the sides at length.2. By way of filing these petitions, the petitioners hav...
High Court Of Gujarat
Muzammil Abdul Kayyum Pathan Through Father Abdul Kayyum vs State Of Gujarat Thro Secretaryspecial
Judges: A J Desai
26 September, 2012·1. By filing present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-detenu through his father Abdul Kayyum Abdul Rehman Pathan has prayed to quash and set aside the order of detention dated 19.6.2012 passed against the detenu by the respondent No.2 – the Commission...
High Court Of Gujarat
Salimsha @ Saludo Hanifsha Sahamdar Through His Maternal vs State Of Gujarat &
Judges: A J Desai
26 September, 2012·1. By filing present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-detenu through his maternal uncle Gulmohammad Ibrahimbhai Sandhi has prayed to quash and set aside the order of detention dated 11.5.2012 passed against the detenu by the respondent No.2 – the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Salim Ibrahimbhai Mor Thro Cousin vs State Of Gujarat Thro Secretary &
Judges: A J Desai
26 September, 2012·1. By filing present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-detenu through his cousin Sajid Daudbhai Junach has prayed to quash and set aside the order of detention dated 01.5.2012 passed against the detenu by the respondent No.2 – the Commissioner of Polic...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rameshbhai Jivabhai Vankar vs District Magistrate & 2
Judges: A J Desai
26 September, 2012·1. By filing present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-detenu has prayed to quash and set aside the order of detention dated 01.06.2012 passed against the detenu by the respondent No.1 – the District Magistrate, Panchmahals at Godhra in exer...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.