Commissioner Service Tax vs Manan Motors Pvt Ltd Opponents
Judges: V M Sahai, N V Anjaria
03 September, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) 1. This appeal has been filed on the following proposed substantial question of law:“Whether the CESTAT was right in invoking the provisions of Section 73(1A) of the Finance Act, 1994 even though these provisions were not applicable to the facts of the case ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Katiyabhai Nevabhai Meda vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: A L, A J Desai
03 September, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) 1. Present appeal arises out of the judgment and order rendered by Sessions Court, Dahod in Sessions Case No.112 of 2005 on March 17, 2006, convicting present appellant for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 and Section 39...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prakash Krushna Bavlekars vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: M R Shah
03 September, 2012·1. Leave to join Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, through Deputy Director, Ahmedabad Zonal Unit, Rupen Bungalow, Near Jain Merchant Society, Behind Badshah Dairy, Panch Tirth Cross Road, Paldi, Ahmedabad 380 007, as party respondent No.2.2. RULE. Ms.Chetna Shah, learned Additional Publi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hiteshbhai Punambhai Makwanas vs State Of Gujarat &
Judges: M R Shah
03 September, 2012·1.00. RULE.1.01. So far as the Criminal Revision Application No.259 of 2011 is concerned, and Ms.Chetna Shah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives the service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent No.1 - State and Mr.Aftabhusen Ansari, learned advocate waives the service of ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hiteshbhai Punambhai Makwanas vs State Of Gujarat &
Judges: M R Shah
03 September, 2012·1.00. RULE.1.01. So far as the Criminal Revision Application No.259 of 2011 is concerned, and Ms.Chetna Shah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives the service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent No.1 - State and Mr.Aftabhusen Ansari, learned advocate waives the service of ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Subhashsingh Samshersinghs vs State Of Gujarat & 1
Judges: M R Shah
03 September, 2012·1. RULE. Ms.Chetna Shah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives the service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent No.1 State and Mr.Hriday Buch, learned advocate waives the service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent No.2.2. In the facts and circumstances of the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jadeja Jitendrasinh Chandrasinhs vs Tax Reconvery Officer Range 3 &
Judges: Harsha Devani Sca 4600 2002, Akil Kureshi
03 September, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. These petitions arise in common factual background. They have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgement. For the purpose of this judgement, we may record the facts as emerging from Special Civil Application No. ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jadeja Jitendrasinh Chandrasinhs vs Tax Reconvery Officer Range 3 &
Judges: Harsha Devani Sca 4600 2002, Akil Kureshi
03 September, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. These petitions arise in common factual background. They have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgement. For the purpose of this judgement, we may record the facts as emerging from Special Civil Application No. ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jadeja Jitendrasinh Chandrasinhs vs Tax Reconvery Officer Range 3 &
Judges: Harsha Devani Sca 4600 2002, Akil Kureshi
03 September, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. These petitions arise in common factual background. They have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgement. For the purpose of this judgement, we may record the facts as emerging from Special Civil Application No. ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jadeja Jitendrasinh Chandrasinhs vs Tax Reconvery Officer Range 3 &
Judges: Harsha Devani Sca 4600 2002, Akil Kureshi
03 September, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. These petitions arise in common factual background. They have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgement. For the purpose of this judgement, we may record the facts as emerging from Special Civil Application No. ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.