State Of Gujarat & 1S vs Kanaiyalal Dhanjibhai Mandalia
Judges: M R Shah
10 October, 2012·1. As common question of law and facts arise in the both the applications and as such they can be said to be cross revisions challenging the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned appellate Court, both the Criminal Revision Applications are heard, decided and disposed of by ...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat & 1S vs Kanaiyalal Dhanjibhai Mandalia
Judges: M R Shah
10 October, 2012·1. As common question of law and facts arise in the both the applications and as such they can be said to be cross revisions challenging the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned appellate Court, both the Criminal Revision Applications are heard, decided and disposed of by ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajkot Police Commissioner &
Judges: A J Desai
10 October, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 13.07.2012 passed by respondent No.1, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short” the Act) by detaining the detenu as a “bootlegger” as defined under Sec...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prahladbhai Tanaji Patil vs O L Of Vijay Mills Ltd Opponents
Judges: N V Anjaria, Ravi R Tripathi
10 October, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) 1. All these OJ Appeals are filed by the persons in possession of the premises constructed on property of Company in question. So far as OJ Appeal Nos.28 of 2008 to 92 of 2008 are concerned, the date of Judgment and Order of the learned Company Judge is...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prahladbhai Tanaji Patil vs O L Of Vijay Mills Ltd Opponents
Judges: N V Anjaria, Ravi R Tripathi
10 October, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) 1. All these OJ Appeals are filed by the persons in possession of the premises constructed on property of Company in question. So far as OJ Appeal Nos.28 of 2008 to 92 of 2008 are concerned, the date of Judgment and Order of the learned Company Judge is...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prahladbhai Tanaji Patil vs O L Of Vijay Mills Ltd Opponents
Judges: N V Anjaria, Ravi R Tripathi
10 October, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) 1. All these OJ Appeals are filed by the persons in possession of the premises constructed on property of Company in question. So far as OJ Appeal Nos.28 of 2008 to 92 of 2008 are concerned, the date of Judgment and Order of the learned Company Judge is...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prahladbhai Tanaji Patil vs O L Of Vijay Mills Ltd Opponents
Judges: N V Anjaria, Ravi R Tripathi
10 October, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) 1. All these OJ Appeals are filed by the persons in possession of the premises constructed on property of Company in question. So far as OJ Appeal Nos.28 of 2008 to 92 of 2008 are concerned, the date of Judgment and Order of the learned Company Judge is...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prahladbhai Tanaji Patil vs O L Of Vijay Mills Ltd Opponents
Judges: N V Anjaria, Ravi R Tripathi
10 October, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) 1. All these OJ Appeals are filed by the persons in possession of the premises constructed on property of Company in question. So far as OJ Appeal Nos.28 of 2008 to 92 of 2008 are concerned, the date of Judgment and Order of the learned Company Judge is...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prahladbhai Tanaji Patil vs O L Of Vijay Mills Ltd Opponents
Judges: N V Anjaria, Ravi R Tripathi
10 October, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) 1. All these OJ Appeals are filed by the persons in possession of the premises constructed on property of Company in question. So far as OJ Appeal Nos.28 of 2008 to 92 of 2008 are concerned, the date of Judgment and Order of the learned Company Judge is...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ushmaben Raj Mahuvakars vs State Of Gujarat & 1
Judges: M R Shah
10 October, 2012·1.00. Rule. Mr.L.B. Dabhi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives the service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent No.1 and Mr.Amrish Pandya, learned advocate waives the service of rule on behalf of the respondent No.2. 2.00. In the facts and circumstances of the case ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.