Veenaben vs State
Judges:
04 May, 2012·Notice of rule to be issued to the respondents returnable on 11th May 2012. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. L.R Pujari appears and waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent No. 1 State.Learned advocate Mr. H. D Chudasama appears and waive service of notice for and on behalf o...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kiran vs Union
Judges:
04 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) By this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-petitioners have challenged the seizures of four of their consignments and have further challenged the order of provisional release passed with regard to t...
High Court Of Gujarat
K vs State
Judges:
04 May, 2012·The petitioner has appeared as party-in-person. Heard the petitioner.Let notice be issued returnable on 9th July 2012.(K.M.THAKER, J.) jani Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mohammad vs State
Judges:
04 May, 2012·Rule.Ms.C.M.Shah, waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with CR No.II-9 of 2012 registered with Sachin Police Stati...
High Court Of Gujarat
Balkrishan vs District
Judges:
04 May, 2012·Heard Mr. S.M. Shaikh, learned Advocate for the petitioner.RULE.Ms. Maithili Mehta, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the jail authority. Direct Service is permitted for rest of the respondents.Registry to list the matter for final hearing in seriatim...
High Court Of Gujarat
Saidaben vs The
Judges:
04 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER) The applicants have taken out present application seeking below mentioned relief:-"11A Recall the order dated 20th October, 2010 passed in Special Civil Application no. 8914 of 2009 and pass appropriate order deleting the sentence "However, one fact appears t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Patel vs Kodiya
Judges:
04 May, 2012·Heard learned advocates for the parties.2. This petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner against the order dated 03.09.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Surendranagar in Criminal Revision Application No.41 of 2010 by which the or...
High Court Of Gujarat
Oriental vs Ambaben
Judges:
04 May, 2012·In spite of earlier order dated 28.03.2012, office objection has not been removed by the learned advocate for the applicant, therefore, the present application stands dismissed for default. No order as to costs.In view of the order passed in Civil application, no order is required to be passed in th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gulamrasool vs State
Judges:
04 May, 2012·Issue notice returnable on 25.6.2012.(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) (swamy) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.