L vs State
Judges:
04 May, 2012·Leave to amend the petition so as to place on record Annexure-AA is granted.Notice returnable on 04/07/2012. Any order of promotion will be subject to other and further order that may be passed by the Court. Direct service is permitted.(K.M.THAKER, J.) (ila) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Abdul vs Nrc
Judges:
04 May, 2012·As recorded in the earlier order dated 9.4.2012, the OJ Appeal is pending before the Division Bench and as submitted by Dr. Yajnik, learned advocate for the official liquidator, it is kept for hearing on 10.5.2012. Hence, S.O. to 25.6.2012.[R.M.CHHAYA, J.] mrpandya Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kanubhai vs District
Judges:
04 May, 2012·Heard Mr.D.K.Nakrani, learned advocate for the petitioner. It is submitted by him that by way of impugned communication dated 13.03.2012 issued by the Collector to the Geologist, a copy of which is endorsed to the petitioner, a decision has been taken not to implement the order dated 01.01.2008 pass...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vodafone vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
04 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Let the matters appear on 15th June 2012. Interim relief granted earlier is extended till then.(Bhaskar Bhattacharya, Actg. C.J.) (J.B.Pardiwala, J.) /moin Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ranjanben vs The
Judges:
04 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY) Rule returnable on 8.5.2012.Learned APP, Mr.Pandya, waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent No.1 - State.State to verify the genuineness of grounds and the antecedents of the applicant.(JAYANT PATEL, J.) (PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) (vipul) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhupendrakumar vs Heir
Judges:
04 May, 2012·In view of the endorsement, issue fresh rule returnable on 22 nd June, 2012.Direct service is permitted.(RAJESH H.SHUKLA, J.) /patil Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Amrutaben vs State
Judges:
04 May, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the parties.Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the custody of vehicle having registration No. GJ-4-D-7276 of 'Indigo Car' admittedly owned and in the name of the petitioner in the record of R.T.O., allegedly involved in offences punishable under Bombay Police ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jay vs Indian
Judges:
04 May, 2012·Mr.Yajnik, learned advocate for the respondent No.2, has submitted that vide communication dated 22.9.2011, the petitioner was informed about seven deficiencies as noticed by the Inspection Committee. He has also submitted that all the seven deficiencies are still not cured by the petitioner.2. Per ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Yashinkhan vs Unknown
Judges:
04 May, 2012·The present application is filed for restoration of First Appeal which came to be dismissed for default.In view of the averments made in the applications, the prayer made in terms of paragraph No.9(B) is granted. First Appeal is ordered to be restored to file, on condition to remove Civil Applicatio...
High Court Of Gujarat
Meghna vs Unknown
Judges:
04 May, 2012·Having heard the learned Advocate for the applicant and in view of the averments made in the application, application deserves to be allowed and is accordingly allowed.MCA No.1016 of 2012 in SCA No.7197 of 2010 is restored to its original file and status. Application stands disposed of accordingly.(...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.