Hargovind vs State
Judges:
23 May, 2012·This is an application preferred under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the applicant, who came to be arrested on 13.3.2012 in connection with CR No. I - 05 of 2012 registered with DCB Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) o...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nurbibi vs State
Judges:
23 May, 2012·1. This application under Section 439(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is filed by the applicant/original accused No.27 as shown in the charge-sheet in connection with C.R. No.I-252 of 2009 and for which Sessions Case No.36 of 2010 for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 307, 328, 2...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gnfc vs Gujarat
Judges:
23 May, 2012·The matter is argued at full length by Party-in-Person Mr.C.K.Bhayani (Mr.Chunilal Kanjibhai Bhayani). The matter was argued for almost three sessions of this Court. The matter started yesterday, i.e. 19.07.2011 after mentioning work was over, i.e. from 11.00 am to 01.45 pm and in the second session...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhikhaji vs State
Judges:
23 May, 2012·Mr.K.P. Rawal, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has stated at the bar that upon reconsideration of the entire matter by the Higher Authority, it has been decided to prefer appeal against the impugned judgment and order of acquittal. It is submitted that a decision is already taken, but it will t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sai vs Nakulan
Judges:
23 May, 2012·[1] Heard Mr.Thakore, learned Senior Advocate with Mr.Manav Mehta, for the petitioner.[2] By way of this petition, challenge is to the order dated 16.05.2012 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Rajkot, which is passed on administrative side, whereby the Special Civil Suit No.186 of 2010 ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Toliyo vs State
Judges:
23 May, 2012·Learned APP is unable to verify the date of marriage ceremony of sister of the applicant scheduled today and 25/5/2012 and in absence of any verification of the above aspect, no order can be passed.S.O.to 14.06.2012.(Anant S. Dave, J.) rakesh/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rakesh vs The Applicant Has Taken Out ...
Judges:
23 May, 2012·1. The applicant has taken out present application seeking below mentioned relief/s:-"16(A) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to review and recall the order (of Hon'ble Justice K.M.Thaker passed in C.A. No.5486 of 2009 on 16.09.2010) at Annexure-D and correct error in the record and proceedings of the c...
High Court Of Gujarat
Cadila vs Biochem
Judges:
23 May, 2012·1.00. Present Appeal From Order under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the appellant - original plaintiff challenging the impugned order dtd.3/7/2008 passed by the learned Additional District Judge and Presiding Officer, FTC No.7, Ahmedabad (Rural) at Mirzapur ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nitin vs State
Judges:
23 May, 2012·Mr.Dabhi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor prays for time by submitting that the person who has come to instruct him, is not aware of the matter. He has submitted that, he will bring it to the notice of the concerned Higher Officer that the person who has come to instruct or assist him is not aw...
High Court Of Gujarat
Abdul vs The
Judges:
23 May, 2012·The present appeal, filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 30th April, 2011 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No.10, Ahmedabad in Criminal Case No.186 of 2006, whereby the learned Magistrate wa...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.