Vishnugiri vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·[1] Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that charge sheet is filed. It is further submitted that considering the nature of allegations and role attributed to the applicant, by imposing suitable conditions, the applicant may be enlarged on bail. It is also submitted that applicant i...
High Court Of Gujarat
Icici vs Pravinbhai
Judges:
29 March, 2012·1. In connection with the vehicular accident that took place on 30.09.2006, present respondent No.3 and 4 preferred claim petition being M.A.C.P. No.1525/2007 u/s.163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Vadodara. The said claim petition was allowed in part by jud...
High Court Of Gujarat
Parshottambhai Galabhai ... vs State Of Gujarat & 3
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Having considered the submissions advanced by Mr.Mehta, learned advocate for the applicant, so also by Mr.Raval, learned APP for the respondent- State and considering the averments made in this application and the relevant papers annexed with this application, more particularly Annexure-A applicatio...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Rashmikant
Judges:
29 March, 2012·1. RULE.Mr. Vaibhav Vyas learned counsel waives service on behalf of respondent no.1.2. By way of interim relief, the impugned judgment and award passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad in Reference (ITC) No.50/1995 (Old) and Reference-CGITA No.636/2004 (New)...
High Court Of Gujarat
Girishchandra vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
29 March, 2012·When the petition is called-out, Mr. Makwana, learned advocate for the petitioner is not present.Mr.Munshaw, learned advocate for the respondent, has submitted that the petitioner had withdrawn certain amount, by way of loan from his Provident Fund Account, though in view of the withdrawal of the am...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jitendra vs Manager
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Draft amendment is granted. The same shall be carried out forthwith.Learned Senior counsel Shri Sanjanwala with Shri Kanojiya, learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the requisite application in prescribed form was presented with all required affidavits by the members of HUF with a r...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pallavbhai vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·When the matter was called out twice, none is present for the respondent complainant, as the contesting party is respondent complainant and the learned counsel is not present. Hence, in order to afford an opportunity, the matter is adjourned to 02.04.2012. Interim relief granted earlier to continue ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pratima vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Having considered the submission advanced by Mr.A.D.Shah, learned advocate for the applicant, who tendered for my perusal the certified copy of charge-sheet, Mr.K.P.Raval, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent no.1-State, seeks time to keep present the concerned Investigating Offic...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs Mr Rc
Judges:
29 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) Notice returnable on 12.04.2012. Mr. Kodekar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1-State of Gujarat.[A.L. DAVE, J.] [N.V. ANJARIA, J.] Amit Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.