Sarotambhai vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application at this stage.Permission granted as prayed for. Application stands disposed of as withdrawn. Notice discharged.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vanrajbhai vs Unknown
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Registry is directed to call for Record and Proceedings of the case from the trial court so as to reach this Court on or before 4/5/2012. S.O. to 7/5/2012.[M.R.SHAH, J.] rafik Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajeshkumar vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Mr.B.B.Naik, learned Senior Advocate with Mr.Satyam Y. Chhaya, learned advocate for the petitioner, states that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition, with a view to approaching the Secretary (Appeals), Revenue Department by way of revision.Without expressing any opinion on merits, permission...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shreeram vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Board shows that notice that notice is unserved to respondent No.2. Office is directed to issue fresh notice returnable on 10.5.2012.(Z.K.SAIYED,J.) ynvyas Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vipulkumar vs Gujarat
Judges:
29 March, 2012·When the petition is taken up for hearing, Mr. Kanabar, learned advocate for the petitioner is not present.1.1 Heard Mr. Munshaw, learned advocate for the respondent.2. The petitioner has prayed for below mentioned relief in present petition:-"11.B Your Lordships further be pleased to issue a writ o...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chandraprakash vs Laxmanzula
Judges:
29 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been filed challenging the order of learned Single Judge dated 29.3.2011 passed in Special Civil Application No.16040 of 2010.2. A writ petition was filed challenging the orders by which application of stay was rejected which...
High Court Of Gujarat
5 vs Notice Served By Ds For Respondent ...
Judges:
29 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) By this Public Interest Litigation, the petitioners have prayed for a direction upon the respondent authorities for stopping establishment and construction activities of the respondent No. 12 of the alleged industrial unit at land b...
High Court Of Gujarat
Madhuben vs The
Judges:
29 March, 2012·1. The present Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the applicants-original defendants nos. 3 to 8 to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 13/05/2011 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Anand below Exh. 37 in Specia...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ranjanben vs Gunwantsinh
Judges:
29 March, 2012·The petitioner original plaintiff has preferred this application seeking to amend the cause title of the petition as also change in the address of respondent No. 4.Heard learned advocate for the petitioner. Necessary amendment in the cause title shall be carried out within one week. Fresh Notice to ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jaisukhbhai vs Sureshbhai
Judges:
29 March, 2012·With the consent of the learned advocates parties, Civil Application No.2559 of 2012 in Special Civil Application No. 291 of 2012 and Special Civil Application No. 291 of 2012 shall be kept for final hearing on 12.4.2012.(Ms.Sonia Gokani, J.) sudhir Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.