Ahmedabad vs Learned
Judges:
11 March, 2012·Learned advocate Mr. JP Bhatt states that unserved respondent is easily available and states that fresh notice be issued. Hence, issue fresh notice returnable on 12/3/2012. Direct service is permitted.(BANKIM.N.MEHTA, J) asma Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Jeshaji
Judges:
11 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Record and proceedings be called for from the trial Court, so as to reach on or before 6.3.2012. S.O. to 7.3.2012.(Jayant Patel, J.) (Paresh Upadhyay, J.) vinod Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dhirendrakumar vs State
Judges:
11 March, 2012·Learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application.Permission granted as prayed for. Matter stands disposed of as withdrawn.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pravin vs State
Judges:
11 March, 2012·1. Rule.Learned APP, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent.2. This successive application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with first information report registered at CR No.I-210 of 2009 with Raopura Police Station, for the offences punishable under...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pravin vs State
Judges:
11 March, 2012·1. Rule.Learned APP, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent.2. This successive application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with first information report registered at CR No.I-123 of 2010 with Panigate Police Station, for the offences punishable unde...
High Court Of Gujarat
Abdul vs Noormamad
Judges:
11 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) This is an application for condonation of delay of 169 days in filing Letters Patent Appeal.Heard learned advocate for the parties.Considering the contents of the application, it cannot be said that the delay caused in filing the appeal has remained totally ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Snehlata vs M. Sahai
Judges:
11 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Heard learned advocate for the applicants.Considering the averments made in the application, the application is allowed. Prayer in terms of para 6(A) is granted. Learned advocate for the applicants is directed to remove the office objections on or before 21s...
High Court Of Gujarat
Narvatsing vs State
Judges:
11 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Mr.Dave, learned Counsel for the applicant, does not press the present application with a view to move for regular bail, if the appeal is not heard within reasonable time. The application is disposed of as not pressed.(Jayant Patel, J.) (Paresh Upadhyay, J....
High Court Of Gujarat
Praful vs State
Judges:
11 March, 2012·Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue as interim relief till further order upon verifying the earning capacity of the applicant and that marriage of the applicant is now registered.Stand over to 27.3.2012.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Narendrabhai vs State
Judges:
11 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) There is no urgency in the matter. Hence, the appeals be listed in usual course. Both the applications are disposed of accordingly.(Jayant Patel, J.) (Paresh Upadhyay, J.) vinod Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.