New vs Kaviben
Judges:
12 March, 2012·1. By way of these appeals under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, the appellant - insurance company has challenged the judgement and award dated 26.04.1996 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Bhavnagar in M.A.C.P Nos. 242 & 243 of 1991 whereby the Tribunal directed the o...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shitalben vs State
Judges:
12 March, 2012·The petitioner has been detained under the provisions of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act of 1985') by the order dated 23.11.2011 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City, and he has been declared as bootlegger.Heard learned advocat...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ramkeshwar vs Mr Ph Pathak For
Judges:
12 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA)1. The petitioner has invoked Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution to, in fact, challenge the order dated 17.11.2011 of Central Administrative Tribunal at Ahmedabad, in OA No.66 of 2009 with MA No.352 of 2009, whereby the main prayer of the respondents to...
High Court Of Gujarat
Modasa vs Vankar
Judges:
12 March, 2012·1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Deepak Sanchela for the petitioner. For the respondent learned counsel Mr. Patel is appearing.2. The petitioner has challenged the award dated 20/10/2011 passed by the Labour Court, Himmatnagar in Reference (LCH) No.20 of 2001 whereby the Labour Court has directed the p...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Jitendrakumar
Judges:
12 March, 2012·1.00. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioners - State of Gujarat and another, to quash and set aside the impugned judgement and order dtd.29/6/2007 passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Rajpipla at Narmada in Criminal Appeal ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shri vs The
Judges:
12 March, 2012·By way of present revision application, filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to quash and set aside the order dated 26th June, 2006 passed by the learned Additional City Sessions Judge, Court No.8, Ahmedabad in Criminal Revis...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Ms
Judges:
12 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) S.O.to 26th March 2012, at the request of learned AGP, for final disposal. In the meantime affidavit-in-reply, if any is proposed to be filed, shall be filed in the office and a copy shall be given to learned counsel for the petitioner in advance.(D.H.Waghel...
High Court Of Gujarat
Zala vs Special
Judges:
12 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) S.O. to 26.03.2012, at the request of learned AGP who proposed to file affidavit-in-reply in the meantime with advance copy to the petitioners.[D.H. WAGHELA, J.] [N.V. ANJARIA, J.] Amit Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Laxminarayan vs State
Judges:
12 March, 2012·Upon instruction from the applicant, the learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application at this stage.Permission is granted.This application stands disposed of as withdrawn.It is made clear that this Court has not entered into the merits of the case.(ANANT S. DAVE, ...
High Court Of Gujarat
United vs Parsottam
Judges:
12 March, 2012·1. By way of this appeal, the appellant-original opponent No.3 has challenged the judgement and award dated 20.06.2000, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Auxiliary), Ahmedabad, in M.A.C.P. No.755 of 1995, whereby the tribunal has awarded compensation in the sum of Rs.1,50,000/- to the cla...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.