Vinodkumar vs State
Judges:
15 June, 2012·Learned advocate Ms. Kruti Shah does not press this application qua applicant No. 3, the signatory of the cheque.Notice to the respondents returnable on 6.7.2012. Learned APP Mr. HL Jani waives service of notice for respondent No. 1-State. Ad-interim relief in terms of para 7(C) till then.(Rajesh H....
High Court Of Gujarat
Gautam vs State
Judges:
15 June, 2012·Mr.Sheth, learned advocate for the applicant, seeks permission to withdraw the present application.Permission, as prayed for, is granted. The instant application stands disposed of, as withdrawn.(J.C.UPADHYAYA,J.) Girish Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Criminal Misc.Application No. ... vs Mr Ay Kogje Ld. App For
Judges:
15 June, 2012·1.Rule. Mr.A.Y.Kogje learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State waives the service.2.Heard learned advocate Mr.J.V.Japee for the applicant and Mr.A.Y.Kogje learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the respondent - State.3.Following aspects are considered :(i) Incident has occurred suddenly;(ii) There ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Criminal Appeal No. 21 Of 2005 vs Ms. Kruti M Shah For Appellant No
Judges:
15 June, 2012·Notice returnable on 18-1-2005. Learned A.P.P. Ms. M.S. Panchal waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent-State.2.Office is directed to call for the record and proceeding of Sessions Case No.75 of 2000 from the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Vadodara, Camp at Chotaudepur so as to ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhupatrai vs Union
Judges:
15 June, 2012·1. Rule.Mr. PS Champaneri, learned Assistant Solicitor General has waived service of Rule on behalf of respondent No.1 and Mr. Rohan Yagnik, learned AGP waives service on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. With consent of learned Advocates appearing for the contesting parties, and since Notice for f...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special Civil Application No. 74 ... vs Unknown
Judges:
15 June, 2012·Draft amendment is allowed.Mr.Soni, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, has submitted that so far as quantum of penalty of 40 times of N.A. assessment is concerned, considering Rule 100 of the Bombay Land Revenue Rules, at the most, the Collector can impose the penalty 40 times of N.A. as...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hansaben vs Mahendra
Judges:
15 June, 2012·Respondent husband is facing these proceedings instituted by wife for not clearing the arrears of monthly maintenance fixed by the Family Court. This petition has been appearing on Board from time to time. On some occasions, the respondent appears before the Court and on some occasions he choses not...
High Court Of Gujarat
Paba vs State
Judges:
15 June, 2012·[1] Rule.Mr.L.B.Dabhi, learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent - State.[2] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicants have prayed to release them on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.I-21 of 2012 register...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kotak vs Official
Judges:
15 June, 2012·Since the cause list does not reflect the name of other learned Advocate appearing for concerned respondent i.e. the name of learned Advocate Mr. Bhagat, office is directed to list the application on 29th June 2012 and reflect the name of all learned Advocates who are appearing for original parties ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Udaji vs State
Judges:
15 June, 2012·Investigating Officer shall remain present with necessary documents of investigation and particularly the report of Handwriting Expert, as also the FSL report on the next date of hearing.S.O to 22nd June 2012.{Ms.Sonia Gokani, J.} Prakash* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.