Arjanbhai vs State
Judges:
18 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The present application is filed praying for suspension of sentence. After the matter is heard for some time, learned advocate for the applicant on instructions of his client does not press this application at this stage. The application is disposed of a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Central vs Gautam
Judges:
18 June, 2012·At the request of Shri Sood, learned advocate for the applicant, Registry is directed to issue fresh notice upon the respondents making it returnable on 9th July 2012. Respondents be served by R.P.A.D at the cost of the applicant as well as by direct service also. Ad-interim relief granted earlier i...
High Court Of Gujarat
Amiruddin vs State
Judges:
18 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The matter Criminal Appeal No.42 of 2010 is on board for final hearing.On perusal of papers, the Court is of the opinion that no case is made out for temporary bail and the same is rejected.(RAVI R. TRIPATHI, J.) (PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) Sunil W. Wagh Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Govindbhai
Judges:
18 June, 2012·Issue notice returnable on 5th July, 2012.(Ms.Sonia Gokani,J) bina Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nizambhai vs State
Judges:
18 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The present application is filed by the convict through jail praying that either appeal should be heard expeditiously or in the alternative, he should be granted regular bail.Taking into consideration the contents of the application and jail remarks, no ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Khodidasbhai vs Anilkumar
Judges:
18 June, 2012·Rule.The present Application has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.Learned Advocate Mr. P.M.Lakhani for the Applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present Application at this stage without prejudice to the r...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special vs Melabhai
Judges:
18 June, 2012·Rule returnable on 10.07.2012.Mr.P.P.Majmudar, learned advocate waives service of rule on behalf of respondent no.9.[M.D.Shah, J.] satish Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Executive vs M/S
Judges:
18 June, 2012·[1] Heard learned advocates for the respective parties.[2] It is jointly submitted by learned advocates appearing for the respective parties that if the order dated 10.05.2011 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ankleshwar below Exh.41 in Special Civil Suit No.176 of 2001 is quashed ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Executive vs M/S
Judges:
18 June, 2012·[1] Heard learned advocates for the respective parties.[2] It is jointly submitted by learned advocates appearing for the respective parties that if the order dated 10.05.2011 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ankleshwar below Exh.38 in Special Civil Suit No.26 of 1999 is quashed a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.