Mahmadsha vs State
Judges:
21 June, 2012·This application is filed seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with First Information Report being CR No.I-18 of 2012 registered with Dakor Police Station, Dist:Kheda, for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 408, 420 and 114 the Indian P...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mukeshkumar vs As
Judges:
21 June, 2012·1. As common question of law and facts arise in the present Civil Revision Application as well as Appeal from Order and they arise out of common judgement and order passed by learned Appellate Court, the present Civil Revision Application as well as Appeal from Order are hereby disposed of together ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Akbako vs State
Judges:
21 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The present application is filed by the convict through Jail seeking temporary bail on the occasion of sad demise of the convict's grand mother. On earlier occasion, viz. 13th June 2012, the learned APP was granted time to take instructions in the matter...
High Court Of Gujarat
Aazamali vs State
Judges:
21 June, 2012·Mr.Bharat Bhavsar, learned Advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the application, reserving the liberty of the applicant to file appropriate application with appropriate documents. Permission as prayed is granted. The matter accordingly stands disposed of.(J.C.UPADHYAYA, J) Ashish ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Abdul vs State
Judges:
21 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) After the matter is heard at length, the Court is of the opinion that no case is made out for bail, hence this application is rejected.[RAVI R. TRIPATHI, J.] [PARESH UPADHYAY, J.] mandora/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs We Have Heard Mrs.Mauna Bhatt
Judges:
21 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)1. We have heard Mrs.Mauna Bhatt, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.S. N. Divatia for the respondent.2. Admit.3. We formulate the following substantial questions of law arise in this tax appeal."[A] Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs We Have Heard Ms. Mauna Bhatt
Judges:
21 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)1. We have heard Ms. Mauna Bhatt, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. R. K. Patel for the respondent.2. Admit.3. We formulate the following substantial questions of law arise in this tax appeal."[A] Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hdfc vs Online
Judges:
21 June, 2012·1. The petitioner HDFC Bank has preferred this petition under Section 433 read with Section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act" for short) seeking winding up of respondent Online Infocom Private Limited.2. The case set out by the petitioner Bank in the petition is that the respondent Company h...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jivanbhai vs Damjibhai
Judges:
21 June, 2012·1. This petition preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the trial Court. It is an application of injunction below Exh.5 in Special Civil Application No.73 of 2012, whereby the Court granted ex parte ad interim injunction in favour of the respondent herein i...
High Court Of Gujarat
Suthar vs Special
Judges:
21 June, 2012·[1] This Civil Application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone delay occurred in filing Cross Objection.[2] Taking into consideration averments made in the application and same has not been controverted by the other side by filing an affidavit or reply, I am of the view that su...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.