Commissioner vs The
Judges:
21 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.V. ANJARIA)1. The Revenue has preferred the present appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to challenge the order dated 04.02.2011 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'C' in ITA No.1886/Ahd/2009, proposing the following question as form...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jitendrabhai vs State
Judges:
21 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Let the matter appear on June 28, 2012.Interim order granted earlier be extended till then.(BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, ACTING CJ.) (J.B.PARDIWALA, J.) zgs/-Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Super vs Union
Judges:
21 June, 2012·Learned counsel have jointly submitted that present petition is connected with Special Civil Application No.2530 of 2011, which is adjourned to 6.7.2012, and therefore, hearing of present petition may also be adjourned to the same date.S.O.to 6.7.2012.To be heard with Special Civil Application No.25...
High Court Of Gujarat
Trikambhai vs Mr Nigam R Shukla For
Judges:
21 June, 2012·Ms.Archna Amin, learned advocate fore Mr.Nigam R. Shukla, learned advocate for the respondents states that the respondents want to file appropriate application. Permission is granted. As and when such application is filed, the office is directed to accept the same and notify along with the present a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Deputy vs Gujarat
Judges:
21 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Heard learned counsel for the parties. Civil Application No.11962 of 2011 for hearing the petition at an early date is allowed. Place Special Civil Application No.13825 of 2009 for final hearing. Apart from prayer for early hearing of the petition, we have n...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gangaben vs State
Judges:
21 June, 2012·Mr.Raval, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present even in the third call. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for default. Notice is discharged.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Tulip vs Union
Judges:
21 June, 2012·Despite the order dated 23.3.2012, the petitioner has not filed any amendment application. Office is also placed a note, stating that the petitioner has not filed any amendment.Learned counsel for the petitioner has requested for time to file amendment application.S.O.to 6.7.2012.(K.M.Thaker, J.) Bh...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sharifkhan vs State
Judges:
21 June, 2012·Rule.Mr. Nanavati, Ld. APP appears and waives service of rule for the respondent State.1. The instant application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail in connection with C.R. No. I-138/2011 registered with Gaekwad Haveli Police Station, for the offences p...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dharmeshkumar vs State
Judges:
21 June, 2012·1. Rule.Mr. K.L.Pandya, learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of Respondent-State.2. Considered the submissions advanced on behalf of both the sides, so also perused condition no. 7(d) which was to the effect that the applicant shall not leave the State of Gujarat without prior perm...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gajanand vs Simplex
Judges:
21 June, 2012·1. By way of filing this petition, the petitioner herein has challenged the order dated 27.01.2010 passed by the Appellate Court in appeal (I.C.) No. 35/09 whereby the Appellate Court has ordered to pay a sum of Rs. 70,000/- towards backwages.2. The petitioner was working with the respondent as a He...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.