Virendrasinh vs State
Judges:
29 June, 2012·Rule.Mr.Kodekar, learned APP appears and waives service of rule for respondent - State.The instant application is filed u/s.438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Ellisbridge Police Station, Ahmedabad C.R.No.-I-188 of 2012 regarding the offences punishable...
High Court Of Gujarat
Anjuman vs Unknown
Judges:
29 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) The applicant - original petitioner seeks direction to the Registry to refund an amount of Rs.6,13,300/- to the applicant.Upon perusal of the documents and hearing the learned advocates for the parties, what emerges on the record is that this Court by an or...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bablusing vs State
Judges:
29 June, 2012·This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 20.01.2012 passed by respondent No. 2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short 'the Act') by detaining the detenue as a "bootlegger" as defined under Sect...
High Court Of Gujarat
Madhavi vs Pipavav
Judges:
29 June, 2012·Notice returnable on 27th July 2012.Direct service is permitted.(Akil Kureshi J.) (vjn) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dhirubhai Kashrubha Zala Thro Cousin Brother Halubha B Zala vs State Of Gujarat Thro Secretary Special &
Judges: Anant S
29 June, 2012·1. This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 17.01.2012 passed by respondent No.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1)/3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short “the Act”) by detaining the detenue as a “bootlegger” as defined und...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dipakbhai @ Dipak Marathi Bhikhabhai Patil Thro Brother In vs State Of Gujarat Thro The Secretary &
Judges: Anant S
29 June, 2012·1. This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 06.01.2012 passed by respondent No.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1)/3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short “the Act”) by detaining the detenue as a “bootlegger” as defined und...
High Court Of Gujarat
Anilbhai @ Aniyo vs State Of Gujarat Through Dy Secretary &
Judges: Anant S
29 June, 2012·1. This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 17.12.2011 passed by respondent No.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1)/3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short “the Act”) by detaining the detenue as a “bootlegger” as defined und...
High Court Of Gujarat
Narendrakumar Hasmukhbhai Modi & 5 vs Savitaben Thakorebhai Modi & 4
Judges: M R Shah
29 June, 2012·1. The present Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the appellants-original plaintiffs to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and decree passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Olpad dated 31/01/2002 in Regular Civil Suit No. 5/1981 ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Trikambhai Jivabhai Vasta & 1 - Defendants
Judges: Anant S
29 June, 2012·1. This Appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short “the Act”) arisess out of judgment and award dated 21.07.2000 passed in M.A.C.P. No.38 of 1994 by the Claims Tribunal – Main, Surendranagar, awarding Rs.72,000/- at the rate of 12% interest per annum from the date of filing ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Suleman Karimbhai Vora & 5 - Defendants
Judges: Anant S
29 June, 2012·1. This appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short “the Act”) challenges the judgment and award dated 29.11.2000 passed by the learned M.A.C. Tribunal (Main), Bhavnagar in M.A.C.P. No.941 of 1998.2. Short facts for which the claim petition was filed are as under:-According t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.