5 Whether It Is To Be Circulated To ... vs State Of Gujarat & 3 ­
Judges:
19 July, 2012·1. Rule. Learned counsel for the respondents waive service on behalf of the respective respondents. With the consent of both the sides, the matter is taken up for final hearing today itself. These petitions involve common questions on facts and law and hence, they are disposed of by this common judg...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs Ms. Archana Raval
Judges:
19 July, 2012·The present Petition has been filed by the Petitioners under Article 21 and 226 of the Constitution of India for the prayers:"(A) To allow this application.(B) To issue a writ of entry or any other writ or direction, directing the respondent nos. 4 to 7 to forthwith vacate the house of the petitione...
High Court Of Gujarat
Varjibhai vs State
Judges:
19 July, 2012·1. By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with CR No. I - 19 of 2011 registered with Fatepura Police Station, for the offences punishable under sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pravinbhai vs Surat
Judges:
19 July, 2012·After arguing the matter, learned counsel Mr. Kapadia appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with a view to approach the appropriate authority under the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act. Permission is granted. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.[K...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
19 July, 2012·Mr.Prashant Desai, learned Senior Counsel for Mr. Deep D. Vyas appearing for respondent Corporation tenders Affidavit-in-Reply which is taken on record. Mr. Dipen Desai, learned Counsel appearing for petitioner seeks time to file rejoinder. S.O. to 8.8.2012.Sd/-(R.M.Chhaya, J.) M.M.BHATT Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayshree vs State
Judges:
19 July, 2012·Rule.Expedited.(K.S.JHAVERI,J.) pawan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Appearance
Judges:
19 July, 2012·Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.In the facts of the case, Appeal is admitted.Bailable warrant in the sum of Rs. 5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) is ordered to be issued against each of the respondents-accused.[Z.K.SAIYED, J.] Hasan.Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Tata vs Tata
Judges:
19 July, 2012·Heard Mr.K.M.Patel, learned Senior Advocate with Mr.Varun K. Patel, learned advocate for the petitioner.Issue Notice and Notice as to interim relief, returnable on 25.07.2012.Mr.T.R.Mishra, learned advocate waives service of notice for respondent No.1.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari, J.) Gaurav+ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.