Mardia Chemicals Ltd vs Commissioner Of Income Tax & 1
Judges: Akil Kureshi, Harsha Devani
23 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. The petitioner has challenged a communication dated 15.1.2001 and further prayed for a direction for refund of the sum of Rs.3,69,157/- with interest from 1.2.1999 till actual payment.2. Brief facts are as under.2.1 The petitioner is a company regis...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special Land Acquisition Officer & 2 vs Ashokbhai Devjibhai Defendants
Judges: Jayant Patel, C L Soni
23 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) 1. Admit. Learned Advocate Mr. NR Desai for learned Advocate Mr. PP Majmudar waives notice of admission for the original claimants. He further states that the respondents – original claimants are not desirous to prefer any cross appeal for enhancement...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special Land Acquisition Officer & 2 vs Ashokbhai Devjibhai Defendants
Judges: Jayant Patel, C L Soni
23 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) 1. Admit. Learned Advocate Mr. NR Desai for learned Advocate Mr. PP Majmudar waives notice of admission for the original claimants. He further states that the respondents – original claimants are not desirous to prefer any cross appeal for enhancement...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special Land Acquisition Officer & 2 vs Ashokbhai Devjibhai Defendants
Judges: Jayant Patel, C L Soni
23 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) 1. Admit. Learned Advocate Mr. NR Desai for learned Advocate Mr. PP Majmudar waives notice of admission for the original claimants. He further states that the respondents – original claimants are not desirous to prefer any cross appeal for enhancement...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ghanchi Bai Rabiya Isa Jada & 7 Defendants
Judges: M R Shah
23 July, 2012·[1.0] Present Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) has been preferred by the appellants herein – original plaintiffs to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and decree dated 03.09.1983 in Regular Civil Suit No.219 of 19...
High Court Of Gujarat
Union Of India &
Judges: V M Sahai, N V Anjaria
23 July, 2012·Though the present writ petition is listed for admission hearing, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal today itself. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner – Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited has challenged the order dated 29.2.201...
High Court Of Gujarat
Viral Builders And Another & 1 vs Union Of India Thro Secretary &
Judges: V M Sahai, N V Anjaria
23 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) 1. We have heard Mr.S.Suryanarayan with Mr.Dhaval Shah, learned counsel appearing for the petitionerss and Mr.Varun K.Patel,learned counsel appearing for the respondents.2. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order of the Tribunal by which...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahamadhusen Ajimkhan Pathan Thro Son Mohsin Mahamadhusen vs State Of Gujarat & 2
Judges: Md Shah
23 July, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 02.04.2012 passed by respondent No.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short” the Act) by detaining the detenu as a “bootlegger” as defined under Se...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jaymal Jayantilal Thakor & 1 vs National Small Industries Corporation Ltd & 2
Judges: K M Thaker
23 July, 2012·When the petition is called out and taken up for hearing, Mr. Munshaw, learned advocate for the petitioner, is not present.2. On 9.7.2012, below mentioned order was passed:-“Mr.Munshaw, learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has died and that, therefore, steps to imple...
High Court Of Gujarat
Fag Bearings India Ltd vs Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax & 1
Judges: Akil Kureshi, Harsha Devani
23 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. The petitioner has prayed for quashing a communication dated 18.4.2001 and consequently prayed for refund of an amount of Rs.19,49,400/ with interest from 1.6.1998 till actual payment.2. Brief facts are as follows :2.1 The petitioner is a company regist...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.