Sadhuvaswanicentre(Saurashtra)Throitsauthorisedtrustee vs Union
Judges:
12 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Due to call given by the Bar Council of India, the lawyers have abstained from the work. Therefore, the matter is adjourned to 18.7.2012.[V.M. SAHAI, J.] [N.V. ANJARIA, J.] Savariya Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Paulbhai vs Pragjibhai
Judges:
12 July, 2012·Time to pay process fee is extended till 16.07.2012.(R.M.CHHAYA, J.) Hitesh Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nileshkumar vs State
Judges:
12 July, 2012·Registry to get details through FAX or e.mail,from the court of learned Principal District Judge, Vadodra, in respect of pending case of applicant namely Nileshkumar @ Neel Yuvraj Arunbhai Rajput, arising from I-CR No. 65 of 2010, registered with Baroda DCB police station for the offences punishable...
High Court Of Gujarat
Director vs M. Sahai
Judges:
12 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Due to call given by the Bar Council of India, the lawyers have abstained from the work. Therefore, the matters are adjourned to 18.7.2012.[V.M. SAHAI, J.] [N.V. ANJARIA, J.] Savariya Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Naroda vs Director
Judges:
12 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Due to call given by the Bar Council of India, the lawyers have abstained from the work. Therefore, the matter is adjourned to 18.7.2012. Interim relief already granted is extended till the next date of listing.[V.M. SAHAI, J.] [N.V. ANJARIA, J.] Savariya To...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hirva vs Assistant
Judges:
12 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Due to call given by the Bar Council of India, the lawyers have abstained from the work. Therefore, the matter is adjourned to 26.7.2012. Interim relief already granted is extended till the next date of listing.[V.M. SAHAI, J.] [N.V. ANJARIA, J.] Savariya To...
High Court Of Gujarat
Raval vs Desk
Judges:
12 July, 2012·In view of the Resolution of the Gujarat High Court Advocates' Association dated 10.07.2012, learned advocates have abstained from work.The endorsement on the Board indicates that notice issued to respondent No.1 has remained unserved, due to paucity of time. The Registry to issue fresh Notice to re...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharat vs Madhya
Judges: K M Thaker
12 July, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioner and learned advocate for respondent were not present in the first call. Therefore, hearing of the petition was deferred.Even in second call also, none remained present.Instead of dismissing the petition on the ground of non-prosecution, hearing is adjourned.S.O.to...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vitthaldas vs Joint
Judges:
12 July, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioner and learned advocates for respondents were not present in the first call. Therefore, hearing of the petition was deferred.Even in second call also, none remained present.Instead of dismissing the petition on the ground of non-prosecution, hearing is adjourned.S.O....
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahesh vs State
Judges:
12 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The present application is filed by the convict through jail seeking temporary bail for a period of 45 days so as to undertake agricultural operations and thus to provide financial assistance to the family.The jail remarks are on record.The convict is un...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.