Munna vs State
Judges:
13 July, 2012·This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 12.03.2012 passed by respondent No.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) / 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short" the Act) by detaining the detenue as a "bootlegger" as defined under...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shantaben Wd/O Yashwant Girdhar Shroffs vs Kailashben W/O Chhanumal Mitthanlal &
Judges: M R Shah
13 July, 2012·1. The present Civil Revision Application under Section 29(2) of the Bombay Rent Act has been preferred by the applicants- heirs and legal representatives of the original plaintiff-original landlord to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned appellate Court-learned ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special Land Acquisition Officer & 1 vs Naranbhai Ashabhai Patels
Judges: Md Shah
13 July, 2012·1. These appeals under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act,1894 have been preferred by the appellants – original opponents – Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bharuch and another challenging the impugned judgment and award dated 14.9.2007 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Fast Tr...
High Court Of Gujarat
Narendra Ramanlal Pathak vs Ashokbhai Ishwarbhai Dalwadi
Judges: M R Shah
13 July, 2012·1. The present Civil Revision Application under section 29(2) of the Bombay Rent Act has been preferred by the applicant herein – original plaintiff to quash and set aside the impugned judgement and order dated 22/10/2001 passed by learned Assistant Judge, Panchmahals, Godhra in Regular Civil A...
High Court Of Gujarat
Suksnysben Champaklal Sukhadiawidow Of R
Judges: M R Shah
13 July, 2012·1.0 As common question of law and facts arise in both these Civil Revision Applications and as they are between the same parties, both these revision applications are heard, decided and disposed of together by this common judgment and order.2.0 Civil Revision Application No.1842 of 1998 has been pre...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kailash Babubhai Ahire Through Mother Meenaben Babubhai vs State Of Gujarat Thro Secrtary &
Judges: Md Shah
13 July, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 15.02.2012 passed by respondent No.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short” the Act) by detaining the detenu as a “bootlegger” as defined under Se...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shyambhai Radkabhai Patel Through His Wife Nitaben Shyambhai vs District Magistrate & 2
Judges: Md Shah
13 July, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 05.03.2012 passed by respondent No.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short” the Act) by detaining the detenu as a “bootlegger” as defined under Se...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mukeshbhai Rameshbhai Bhatt Thro Gitaben Rameshbhai Bhatt vs Commissioner Of Police & 2
Judges: Md Shah
13 July, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 05.03.2012 passed by respondent No.1, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short” the Act) by detaining the detenu as a “bootlegger” as defined under Se...
High Court Of Gujarat
Firozkhan Majidkhan Pathan vs State Of Gujarat Thro Secretary &
Judges: Md Shah
13 July, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 15.02.2012 passed by respondent No.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short” the Act) by detaining the detenu as a “bootlegger” as defined under Se...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gulphamkhan Kallukhan Pathan vs Commissioner Of Police & 2
Judges: Md Shah
13 July, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 09.03.2012 passed by respondent No.1, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short” the Act) by detaining the detenu as a “bootlegger” as defined under Se...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.