Najmunnisa vs State
Judges:
18 July, 2012·1. This application has been preferred under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in connection with the offence being CR No. I-89 of 2011 registered with Sayajiganj Police Station, Vadodara, for the offence u/s. 406, 420 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code.2. Learned advocate Mr. Satta appea...
High Court Of Gujarat
Naroda vs Director
Judges:
18 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Mr.M.R. Bhatt, learned Senior Counsel prays for and allowed two weeks' time to file affidavit-in-reply, learned counsel for the petitioner to file affidavit-in-rejoinder one week thereafter. List the matter on 8th August 2012. Interim relief granted earlier ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat vs Workmen
Judges:
18 July, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the parties.The petitioner, an incorporated Company under the provision of the Companies Act, 1956, and first party in reference being Reference (I.T.) No.9/95 in the Industrial Tribunal, Surat and applicant in Miscellaneous Application (I.T. 1/99), has approached this Cou...
High Court Of Gujarat
Piyushkumar vs State
Judges:
18 July, 2012·Notice to the Respondents, returnable on 03.08.2012.Learned APP Ms.Archana Raval, waives service of notice for Respondent No.1-State of Gujarat.Direct Service qua Respondent Nos.3 to 5 is permitted.(RAJESH H. SHUKLA, J.) mehul Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Naja vs State
Judges:
18 July, 2012·Learned advocate seeks permission to withdraw this Application; as far as applicant No.2 is concerned.As far as applicant Nos. 1, 3 and 4 are concerned, they are under-trial prisoners involved in the offence punishable u/s. 323, 324, 504, 506 (2) and 114 of IPC r/w section 135 of the Bombay Police A...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharuch vs State
Judges:
18 July, 2012·1. Heard Mr.Chirag B. Patel, learned counsel appearing with Ms.Rupal K. Thakore for the petitioners and Ms.Asmita Patel, learned A.G.P. appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Though served, no one appears for respondent No.3.2. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pravinbhai vs Narrotambhai
Judges:
18 July, 2012·(1) RULE.Mr.Dhawan M. Jayswal, learned advocate for respondent No.1, and Ms.Nisha Thakor, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.2, appear and waive service of rule for the respective parties. As the matter arises out of non-grant of interim relief by the Secretary (Appeals), Revenue...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhaveshkumar vs State
Judges:
18 July, 2012·By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for direction to quash and set aside the communication dated 09.04.2012 by which the petitioner was informed to get/take lump sum instead of getting compassionate appointments as the State government has decided to only give lump sum amount to the r...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pravinchandra vs State
Judges:
18 July, 2012·NOTICE returnable on 20.07.2012.Respondent No.3 is hereby directed to place on record of this petition as to what steps have been taken by respondent Nos.2 and 3 pursuant to the earlier notice issued by them under Section 267 of the Gujarat (Bombay) Provincial Municipal Corporations Act.Direct servi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.