Rupera Transport Company vs Union Of India Owning And Reprnorthern Railway Administratio
Judges: Md Shah
18 July, 2012·1. Leave to amend the prayer clause. Amendment be carried out forthwith.2. Heard learned advocate, Mr.Nilesh A.Pandya for the appellant and learned advocate, Mr.Shevade for the respondent.3. Learned advocate, Mr.Pandya for the appellant, relying upon a judgment of this Court repor...
High Court Of Gujarat
New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Vijuben Prabhubhai &Defendants
Judges: J C Upadhyaya
18 July, 2012·: These 3 appeals arise out of the common judgment and award dated 1/7/2005 rendered by the M.A.C. Tribunal [Main], Surendranagar [hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal'] in M.A.C. Petition No. 96/1996 and other allied matters. The First Appeal No. 45/2006 arises out of the common judgment ...
High Court Of Gujarat
New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Vijuben Prabhubhai &Defendants
Judges: J C Upadhyaya
18 July, 2012·: These 3 appeals arise out of the common judgment and award dated 1/7/2005 rendered by the M.A.C. Tribunal [Main], Surendranagar [hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal'] in M.A.C. Petition No. 96/1996 and other allied matters. The First Appeal No. 45/2006 arises out of the common judgment ...
High Court Of Gujarat
New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Vijuben Prabhubhai &Defendants
Judges: J C Upadhyaya
18 July, 2012·: These 3 appeals arise out of the common judgment and award dated 1/7/2005 rendered by the M.A.C. Tribunal [Main], Surendranagar [hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal'] in M.A.C. Petition No. 96/1996 and other allied matters. The First Appeal No. 45/2006 arises out of the common judgment ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat State Financial Corp vs Yasika Cycles Pvt Ltd & 4 Defendants
Judges: Jayant Patel, C L Soni
18 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 27.2.2012 passed by the learned District Judge below Civil Misc. Application No.56 of 2002 and the interim application Exh. 5 therein, whereby the learned Judge found that since the properties are lo...
High Court Of Gujarat
Municipal Corp Of Ahmedabad vs Rajnikant Manubhai Choksi Defendants
Judges: J C Upadhyaya
18 July, 2012·1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment and decree rendered by learned Judge, City Civil Court No.18, Ahmedabad on 25.7.1996 in Civil Suit No.13 of 1987 whereby the trial Court allowed and decreed the suit filed by the respondent herein, who was original plaintiff in said suit and d...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jaising Arjanbhai
Judges: Jayant Patel, C L Soni
18 July, 2012·IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD FIRST APPEAL No. 262 of 1988 With CROSS OBJECT No. 80 of 2010 For Approval and Signature:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL Sd/-HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.L. SONI Sd/-=========================================<table cellspacing="0" style="border-colla...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mehulbhai Mangubhai Dhodiya Patel Through His Brother In Law vs State Of Gujarat &
Judges: Md Shah
18 July, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 23.3.2012 passed by respondent No.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short” the Act) by detaining the detenu as a “bootlegger” as defined under Sect...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nayanbhai @Sanjay Becharbhai Parmar Thro Brohter In Law vs State Of Gujarat & 2
Judges: Md Shah
18 July, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 22.3.2012 passed by respondent No.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short” the Act) by detaining the detenu as a “dangerous person” as defined und...
High Court Of Gujarat
Muneshbhai Ramjibhai Chaudharithro Father Ramjibhai vs District Magistrate & 2
Judges: Md Shah
18 July, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 23.3.2012 passed by respondent No.1, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short” the Act) by detaining the detenu as a “bootlegger” as defined under Sect...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.