Bhat vs Collector
Judges:
25 January, 2012·Office objections be removed on, or before, 13.02.2012, failing which the petition(s) shall be dismissed, without reference to the Court.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari,J) arg Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
D vs Through
Judges:
25 January, 2012·The petitioner by way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has prayed for the following reliefs:"A) Directing the Respondents to fix and pay all the service benefits to the petitioner including pay fixation, annual increment, final pension, etc.B) Directing the Respondent ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Majeedkhan vs State
Judges:
25 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) The present application has been preferred by the applicant - accused for temporary bail on the ground that he wants to attend marriage of his brother-in-law.Pursuant to the earlier order passed by this Court, the learned APP, based on the report received b...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharatsinh vs State
Judges:
25 January, 2012·Heard learned advocate Mr.R.C.Kakkad, for the applicant and Mr.H.L.Jani, learned APP for the respondent - State.Mr.Kakkad has contended that the judgment and order under challenged is pronounced by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.3, Khambhaliya on 19.3.2011, the applicant ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Icici vs Ashokbhai
Judges:
25 January, 2012·1. Though served, none appears on behalf of the respondents.2. Heard.This is an appeal by the Insurance Company challenging the award under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Obviously, this award is in the nature of an interim award which is subject to the adjustment against the award whi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mallikaben vs National
Judges:
25 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) It appears that by this application, applicant has prayed for interim direction in the pending First Appeal. However, it appears that the main appeal has been disposed of on merit. Thus, this application has become infructuous and i...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sukhdevsinh vs State
Judges:
25 January, 2012·In spite of service of notice, no one appears for private respondents.Having heard learned advocate for the petitioners and in view of what is recorded in the order dated 25.01.2012, this petition deserves to be admitted.Rule.Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till final disposal of the p...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayendra vs Punjab
Judges:
25 January, 2012·Ms.Sona Sagar, learned advocate appearing for respondents, seeks four weeks' time to file affidavit-in-reply. Ms.Archna U. Amin, learned advocate for the petitioner, has no objection for the same. Hence, S.O. to 21.02.2012.Sd/-[R.M.CHHAYA, J ] *** Bhavesh* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bliss vs State
Judges:
25 January, 2012·Notice returnable on 06.02.2012.(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) Pankaj Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
S.M.Ranva vs State
Judges:
25 January, 2012·Mr.V.M. Trivedi, learned advocate for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Permission is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Rule discharged with no order as to costs.[R.M.CHHAYA, J.] mrpandya Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.