Ahmedabad vs In Fact
Judges:
11 January, 2012·(Per :HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. S.J. MUKHOPADHAYA) A public interest litigation in S.C.A No. 10488/2008 has been preferred for compliance of directions of this Court in the cases of Consumer Protection Council vs. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation [2000 (3) GLR 2607]; Suo Motu vs. Ahmedabad Mun...
High Court Of Gujarat
Heirs vs Thakker
Judges:
11 January, 2012·Heard.On the facts and circumstances of the case sufficient cause is shown to condone the delay. The delay is, therefore, condoned and the application is granted. Rule is made absolute with no order as to costs. First Appeal to be listed for admission on 17.01.2012.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prakashchandra vs Central
Judges:
11 January, 2012·Learned advocate Mr.P.K.Pancholi places on record a note dated 19th October 2010 indicating that under the instructions of the petitioner who is present in the Court, he seeks permission to retire. Permission, as prayed for, is granted. By the next date of hearing, the petitioner shall make arrangem...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shardaben vs Lilaben
Judges:
11 January, 2012·Mr.S. K. Bukhari, learned advocate for the applicants is reported to be sick. Hence, the matter is adjourned to 16.01.2012.[HARSHA DEVANI, J.] parmar* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Assets vs Official
Judges:
11 January, 2012·In the first call, hearing of the Company Application No.570 of 2011 was deferred/pass-over at the request made on behalf of the learned advocate for the applicant.2. Before the present application, i.e. Company Application No.570 of 2011, could be taken-up for hearing in second call (since in first...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hazira vs Unknown
Judges:
11 January, 2012·Mrs.Soparkar, learned advocate for the petitioner has, at the outset submitted that present petition is preferred by the transferee company and that therefore any question of meeting of secured creditor would not arise. She, therefore, requested for permission to amend the relevant clause (i.e. para...
High Court Of Gujarat
Punjabhai vs State
Judges:
11 January, 2012·By way of this petition, the petitioners have challenged the order passed by the Chief Secretary, Revenue Department (Appeals), dated 7.9.2010/ 13.9.2010, whereby the application praying for stay of the order dated 4.5.2010 passed by the Collector, Junagadh, has been rejected.2. The brief facts of t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kodekar vs State
Judges:
11 January, 2012·1. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this application is taken up for hearing today.2. This is an application preferred by the applicant seeking bail against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Vijapur in Cr...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ankur vs State
Judges:
11 January, 2012·1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner, original complainant, seeking a direction against respondent No.1-State of Gujarat, to appoint a Special Public Prosecutor by exercising power under section 24(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1972 [for s...
High Court Of Gujarat
Janardan vs Collector
Judges:
11 January, 2012·By way of this petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 22.10.2010 at Annexure.G passed by the Collector, Kachchh as well as the Entry No.1494 dated 2.1.2010 recorded by the Deputy Mamlatdar in Form No.6, at Annexure.F to the petition.2. The brief facts of the case are that, the pet...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.