Kamlabhai vs State
Judges:
16 January, 2012·1. This is an application preferred under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the applicants who came to be arrested in connection with CR No. I-44 of 2010 registered at Fatepura Police Station, District : Dahod, for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420, 381, 467, 468, 47...
High Court Of Gujarat
Narendrasinh vs State
Judges:
16 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Rule.Mr.Pandya, learned APP waives service of notice of Rule.The present application has been preferred by the applicant - accused for temporary bail on the ground that he wants to arrange for repairing work of his house.Pursuant to the earlier order passed...
High Court Of Gujarat
Govt vs No.2
Judges:
16 January, 2012·1. After reference to the latest affidavit-in-reply of Principal Secretary, Finance Department, filed pursuant to previous order dated 18.7.2006, it was seen that a bland statement on behalf of the respondent is made on affidavit to state that Cabinet Sub-Committee did not accept the recommendation ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dashrathji vs State
Judges:
16 January, 2012·By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release them on regular bail in connection with CR No.I-227 of 2011 registered with Kadi Police Station, for the offence punishable under Sections 306, 498(A), 304(B) and 34 of...
High Court Of Gujarat
Babusing vs State
Judges:
16 January, 2012·The petitioner has been detained under the provisions of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act of 1985') by the order dated 13.06.2011 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City, and he has been declared as bootlegger.Heard learned advocat...
High Court Of Gujarat
Paliyad vs State
Judges:
16 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) The appellant challenges the order passed in Special Civil Application No.20427 of 2005. The grievance is against the order passed by learned single judge to pay retiral benefits to the petitioner, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the or...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jitendrasinh vs Unknown
Judges:
16 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Admit.(JAYANT PATEL, J.) (PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) *bjoy Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahipatsinh vs State
Judges:
16 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) Learned advocate Mr.Mehta seeks time, in view of the fact that the respondent-Authority has not come out with any reply, pursuant to the order impugned herein passed by the learned Single Judge. Hence, S.O. to 27.02.2012 as requested.[A.L.DAVE, J.] [MOHINDER PA...
High Court Of Gujarat
Oriental vs Pravinkumar
Judges:
16 January, 2012·ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD - Petitioner(s) Versus PRAVINKUMAR NARANDAS SADHU & 2 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance :MR KK NAIR for Petitioner(s) : 1, RULE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 1 -3. ========================================================= CORA...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kamlabhai vs State
Judges:
16 January, 2012·1. This is an application preferred under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the applicants who came to be arrested in connection with CR No. I - 19 of 2011 registered at Fatepura Police Station, District : Dahod, for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.